Demographics details for Avon, MT vs Westminster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Avon, MT vs Westminster, CA.
| Data | Avon | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 164 | 89,397 |
| Median Age | 19.1 years | 41.6 years |
| Median Income | $64,306 | $80,271 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Avon vs Westminster
- The population in Westminster is higher at 89,397, compared to 164 in Avon.
- The median age in Westminster is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 19.1 years in Avon.
- Westminster has a higher median income of $80,271, compared to $64,306 in Avon.
- In Westminster, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 35.0% in Avon.
- The poverty level is higher in Westminster at 11%, compared to 0% in Avon.
- Westminster has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.5% in Avon.
Demographics
Demographics Avon vs Westminster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Avon | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 100 | 16 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 51 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 24 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Avon vs Westminster
- In Westminster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Avon.
- Avon has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 16% in Westminster.
- In Westminster, the Asian population stands at 51%, greater than 0% in Avon.
- Westminster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 0% in Avon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Westminster at 8%, compared to 0% in Avon.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Avon and Westminster at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Avon | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 15.3% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 12.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 13.0% |
| Obesity | 34.3% | 23.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Avon vs Westminster
- More residents in Avon report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 14.9% in Westminster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Avon at 24.1% compared to 15.3% in Westminster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Avon at 18.6% compared to 12.5% in Westminster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Avon at 21.4% compared to 13.0% in Westminster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Avon at 34.3% compared to 23.4% in Westminster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Westminster at 12.0% compared to 6.0% in Avon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Avon | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 4.5% (4,006) |
| High School Diploma | 4.3% (7) | 16.0% (14,303) |
| Less than High School | 4.9% (8) | 21.5% (19,217) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (35) | 18.5% (16,558) |
Education Levels Comparison: Avon vs Westminster
- In Westminster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.0% in Avon.
- In Westminster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 4.3% in Avon.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Westminster at 21.5%, compared to 4.9% in Avon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Avon hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 18.5% in Westminster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.