Demographics details for Avoca, NE vs Pharr, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Avoca, NE vs Pharr, TX.
| Data | Avoca | Pharr |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 184 | 80,179 |
| Median Age | 28.8 years | 29.4 years |
| Median Income | $68,125 | $45,016 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 24% |
| Unemployment Rate | Data is updating | 7.6 |
Population Comparison: Avoca vs Pharr
- The population in Pharr is higher at 80,179, compared to 184 in Avoca.
- The median age in Pharr is higher at 29.4 years, compared to 28.8 years in Avoca.
- Avoca has a higher median income of $68,125 compared to $45,016 in Pharr.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Avoca at 38.0% compared to 34.0% in Pharr.
- The poverty level is higher in Pharr at 24%, compared to 0% in Avoca.
- Pharr has a higher unemployment rate at 7.6% compared to 0.0% in Avoca.
Demographics
Demographics Avoca vs Pharr provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Avoca | Pharr |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 98 | -26 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 94 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 31 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Avoca vs Pharr
- In Pharr, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Avoca.
- Avoca has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to -26% in Pharr.
- Both Avoca and Pharr have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Pharr has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 94%, compared to 0% in Avoca.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pharr at 31%, compared to 2% in Avoca.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Avoca and Pharr at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Avoca | Pharr |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 16.5% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 13.9% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.7% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 45.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Avoca vs Pharr
- In Pharr, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 12.8% in Avoca.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pharr at 19.9% versus 17.9% in Avoca.
- Pharr has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 13.9% in Avoca.
- Binge drinking is more common in Avoca at 22.7% compared to 15.8% in Pharr.
- Pharr has higher obesity rates at 45.4% compared to 38.6% in Avoca.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pharr at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Avoca.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Avoca | Pharr |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.1% (1,723) |
| High School Diploma | 30.4% (56) | 13.2% (10,587) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (16) | 33.7% (27,024) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.3% (6) | 9.7% (7,741) |
Education Levels Comparison: Avoca vs Pharr
- In Pharr, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Avoca.
- A higher percentage of residents in Avoca hold a high school diploma at 30.4% compared to 13.2% in Pharr.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pharr at 33.7%, compared to 8.7% in Avoca.
- In Pharr, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.7% compared to 3.3% in Avoca.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.