Demographics details for Averill park, NY vs Waipahu, HI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Averill park, NY vs Waipahu, HI.

Data Averill park Waipahu
Population 1,608 39,873
Median Age 53.3 years 39.6 years
Median Income $109,746 $87,961
Married Families 50.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 4% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.6

Population Comparison: Averill park vs Waipahu

  • The population in Waipahu is higher at 39,873, compared to 1,608 in Averill park.
  • Residents in Averill park have a higher median age of 53.3 years compared to 39.6 years in Waipahu.
  • Averill park has a higher median income of $109,746 compared to $87,961 in Waipahu.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Averill park at 50.0% compared to 38.0% in Waipahu.
  • The poverty level is higher in Waipahu at 10%, compared to 4% in Averill park.
  • Waipahu has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.5% in Averill park.

Demographics

Demographics Averill park vs Waipahu provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Averill park Waipahu
Black Data is updating 1
White 100 11
Asian Data is updating 67
Hispanic Data is updating 6
Two or More Races Data is updating 15
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Averill park vs Waipahu

  • In Waipahu, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • Averill park has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 11% in Waipahu.
  • In Waipahu, the Asian population stands at 67%, greater than 0% in Averill park.
  • Waipahu has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waipahu at 15%, compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Averill park and Waipahu at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Averill park Waipahu
Mental Health Not Good 14.6% 12.7%
Physical Health Not Good 9.1% 8.3%
Depression 23.7% 10.2%
Smoking 15.9% 12.9%
Binge Drinking 21.5% 14.8%
Obesity 34.6% 22.4%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Averill park vs Waipahu

  • More residents in Averill park report poor mental health at 14.6% compared to 12.7% in Waipahu.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Averill park at 23.7% compared to 10.2% in Waipahu.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Averill park at 15.9% compared to 12.9% in Waipahu.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Averill park at 21.5% compared to 14.8% in Waipahu.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Averill park at 34.6% compared to 22.4% in Waipahu.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Averill park and Waipahu at 14.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Averill park Waipahu
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.8% (729)
High School Diploma 22.0% (354) 22.1% (8,831)
Less than High School 3.7% (60) 11.0% (4,392)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 32.3% (520) 13.0% (5,195)

Education Levels Comparison: Averill park vs Waipahu

  • In Waipahu, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Averill park.
  • In Waipahu, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.1% compared to 22.0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waipahu at 11.0%, compared to 3.7% in Averill park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Averill park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 13.0% in Waipahu.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.