Demographics details for Augusta, WI vs Clayton, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Augusta, WI vs Clayton, NC.
| Data | Augusta | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,527 | 29,445 |
| Median Age | 40.1 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $50,243 | $71,698 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Augusta vs Clayton
- The population in Clayton is higher at 29,445, compared to 1,527 in Augusta.
- Residents in Augusta have a higher median age of 40.1 years compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $71,698, compared to $50,243 in Augusta.
- In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 24.0% in Augusta.
- Augusta has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.5% in Augusta.
Demographics
Demographics Augusta vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Augusta | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 22 |
| White | 91 | 59 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Augusta vs Clayton
- In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 0% in Augusta.
- Augusta has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 59% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Augusta.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 1% in Augusta.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Augusta at 8% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Augusta and Clayton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Augusta | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 21.4% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.3% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Augusta vs Clayton
- More residents in Augusta report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Augusta at 25.7% compared to 23.1% in Clayton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Augusta at 21.4% compared to 15.2% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Augusta at 24.3% compared to 17.6% in Clayton.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 35.1% in Augusta.
- Disability percentages are higher in Augusta at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Augusta | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (2) | 0.7% (210) |
| High School Diploma | 24.5% (374) | 12.6% (3,700) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (197) | 5.4% (1,598) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (107) | 18.6% (5,471) |
Education Levels Comparison: Augusta vs Clayton
- In Clayton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Augusta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Augusta hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 12.6% in Clayton.
- More residents in Augusta have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 5.4% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 7.0% in Augusta.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.