Demographics details for Auburn, AL vs Mendenhall, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Auburn, AL vs Mendenhall, MS.
Data | Auburn | Mendenhall |
---|---|---|
Population | 80,006 | 2,148 |
Median Age | 25.9 years | 39.0 years |
Median Income | $55,509 | $35,956 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Auburn vs Mendenhall
- In Auburn, the population is higher at 80,006, compared to 2,148 in Mendenhall.
- The median age in Mendenhall is higher at 39.0 years, compared to 25.9 years in Auburn.
- Auburn has a higher median income of $55,509 compared to $35,956 in Mendenhall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Auburn at 32.0% compared to 31.0% in Mendenhall.
- The poverty level is higher in Mendenhall at 20%, compared to 10% in Auburn.
- Mendenhall has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 3.0% in Auburn.
Demographics
Demographics Auburn vs Mendenhall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Auburn | Mendenhall |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | 65 |
White | 69 | 34 |
Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 3 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Auburn vs Mendenhall
- In Mendenhall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 65% compared to 17% in Auburn.
- Auburn has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 34% in Mendenhall.
- The Asian population is larger in Auburn at 8% compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Auburn at 3% compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Auburn at 3% compared to 1% in Mendenhall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Auburn and Mendenhall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Auburn | Mendenhall |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 14.6% |
Depression | 22.0% | 24.8% |
Smoking | 15.5% | 24.5% |
Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 13.7% |
Obesity | 38.7% | 46.3% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Auburn vs Mendenhall
- In Mendenhall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.6% in Auburn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mendenhall at 24.8% versus 22.0% in Auburn.
- Mendenhall has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 15.5% in Auburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Auburn at 14.5% compared to 13.7% in Mendenhall.
- Mendenhall has higher obesity rates at 46.3% compared to 38.7% in Auburn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mendenhall at 30.0% compared to 8.0% in Auburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Auburn | Mendenhall |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (236) | 0.7% (16) |
High School Diploma | 5.3% (4,206) | 17.9% (385) |
Less than High School | 2.5% (1,964) | 20.7% (445) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.7% (24,546) | 18.4% (395) |
Education Levels Comparison: Auburn vs Mendenhall
- In Mendenhall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Auburn.
- In Mendenhall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 5.3% in Auburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mendenhall at 20.7%, compared to 2.5% in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Auburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.7% compared to 18.4% in Mendenhall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.