Demographics details for Ashville, AL vs Stillwater, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ashville, AL vs Stillwater, OK.
| Data | Ashville | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,382 | 49,160 |
| Median Age | 40.3 years | 23.4 years |
| Median Income | $54,785 | $39,998 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Ashville vs Stillwater
- The population in Stillwater is higher at 49,160, compared to 2,382 in Ashville.
- Residents in Ashville have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 23.4 years in Stillwater.
- Ashville has a higher median income of $54,785 compared to $39,998 in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, the percentage of married families is higher at 25.0%, compared to 23.0% in Ashville.
- The poverty level is higher in Stillwater at 16%, compared to 9% in Ashville.
- Stillwater has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.2% in Ashville.
Demographics
Demographics Ashville vs Stillwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ashville | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | 5 |
| White | 76 | 72 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 9 |
| American Indian | 2 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Ashville vs Stillwater
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ashville at 20% compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- Ashville has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 72% in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Ashville.
- Stillwater has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Ashville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stillwater at 9%, compared to 0% in Ashville.
- In Stillwater, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 2% in Ashville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ashville | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.5% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 26.1% |
| Smoking | 22.6% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 42.6% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ashville vs Stillwater
- More residents in Ashville report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 19.1% in Stillwater.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stillwater at 26.1% versus 24.8% in Ashville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ashville at 22.6% compared to 19.5% in Stillwater.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ashville at 14.3% compared to 13.6% in Stillwater.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ashville at 42.6% compared to 42.0% in Stillwater.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ashville at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Stillwater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ashville | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (47) | 0.5% (239) |
| High School Diploma | 16.8% (400) | 6.5% (3,199) |
| Less than High School | 29.5% (703) | 3.9% (1,910) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.5% (156) | 22.5% (11,068) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ashville vs Stillwater
- A higher percentage of residents in Ashville have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.5% in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ashville hold a high school diploma at 16.8% compared to 6.5% in Stillwater.
- More residents in Ashville have less than a high school education at 29.5% compared to 3.9% in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 6.5% in Ashville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.