Demographics details for Arrington, VA vs South portland, ME

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Arrington, VA vs South portland, ME.

Data Arrington South portland
Population 1,226 27,026
Median Age 31.3 years 41.0 years
Median Income $58,144 $82,489
Married Families 40.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 8% 7%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 2.4

Population Comparison: Arrington vs South portland

  • The population in South portland is higher at 27,026, compared to 1,226 in Arrington.
  • The median age in South portland is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 31.3 years in Arrington.
  • South portland has a higher median income of $82,489, compared to $58,144 in Arrington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Arrington at 40.0% compared to 38.0% in South portland.
  • Arrington has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 7% in South portland.
  • The unemployment rate in Arrington is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.4% in South portland.

Demographics

Demographics Arrington vs South portland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Arrington South portland
Black 41 7
White 59 83
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic Data is updating 3
Two or More Races Data is updating 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Arrington vs South portland

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Arrington at 41% compared to 7% in South portland.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in South portland at 83% compared to 59% in Arrington.
  • In South portland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Arrington.
  • South portland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Arrington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South portland at 5%, compared to 0% in Arrington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arrington and South portland at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Arrington South portland
Mental Health Not Good 19.7% 14.8%
Physical Health Not Good 14.0% 8.5%
Depression 25.2% 23.8%
Smoking 23.1% 12.2%
Binge Drinking 15.3% 20.1%
Obesity 42.4% 26.2%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Arrington vs South portland

  • More residents in Arrington report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 14.8% in South portland.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Arrington at 25.2% compared to 23.8% in South portland.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Arrington at 23.1% compared to 12.2% in South portland.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South portland at 20.1% compared to 15.3% in Arrington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Arrington at 42.4% compared to 26.2% in South portland.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South portland at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in Arrington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Arrington South portland
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.3% (93)
High School Diploma 17.0% (208) 13.2% (3,562)
Less than High School 21.2% (260) 4.4% (1,202)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.1% (247) 35.5% (9,604)

Education Levels Comparison: Arrington vs South portland

  • In South portland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Arrington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Arrington hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 13.2% in South portland.
  • More residents in Arrington have less than a high school education at 21.2% compared to 4.4% in South portland.
  • In South portland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.5% compared to 20.1% in Arrington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.