Demographics details for Arrington, VA vs Newnan, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arrington, VA vs Newnan, GA.
| Data | Arrington | Newnan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,226 | 44,485 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $58,144 | $74,606 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Arrington vs Newnan
- The population in Newnan is higher at 44,485, compared to 1,226 in Arrington.
- The median age in Newnan is higher at 35.0 years, compared to 31.3 years in Arrington.
- Newnan has a higher median income of $74,606, compared to $58,144 in Arrington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Arrington at 40.0% compared to 36.0% in Newnan.
- The poverty level is higher in Newnan at 10%, compared to 8% in Arrington.
- Newnan has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Arrington.
Demographics
Demographics Arrington vs Newnan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Arrington | Newnan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 41 | 34 |
| White | 59 | 48 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Arrington vs Newnan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Arrington at 41% compared to 34% in Newnan.
- Arrington has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 48% in Newnan.
- In Newnan, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Arrington.
- Newnan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Arrington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Newnan at 7%, compared to 0% in Arrington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arrington and Newnan at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Arrington | Newnan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 16.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 42.4% | 36.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arrington vs Newnan
- More residents in Arrington report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 16.7% in Newnan.
- Depression is more prevalent in Arrington at 25.2% compared to 20.4% in Newnan.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Arrington at 23.1% compared to 16.3% in Newnan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Newnan at 15.7% compared to 15.3% in Arrington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Arrington at 42.4% compared to 36.3% in Newnan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Newnan at 9.0% compared to 6.0% in Arrington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Arrington | Newnan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (150) |
| High School Diploma | 17.0% (208) | 12.5% (5,575) |
| Less than High School | 21.2% (260) | 9.0% (3,998) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.1% (247) | 24.3% (10,809) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arrington vs Newnan
- In Newnan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Arrington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arrington hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 12.5% in Newnan.
- More residents in Arrington have less than a high school education at 21.2% compared to 9.0% in Newnan.
- In Newnan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.3% compared to 20.1% in Arrington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.