Demographics details for Arnoldsville, GA vs Picayune, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arnoldsville, GA vs Picayune, MS.
| Data | Arnoldsville | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 451 | 11,826 |
| Median Age | 46.3 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $42,292 | $35,649 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Arnoldsville vs Picayune
- The population in Picayune is higher at 11,826, compared to 451 in Arnoldsville.
- Residents in Arnoldsville have a higher median age of 46.3 years compared to 38.3 years in Picayune.
- Arnoldsville has a higher median income of $42,292 compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Arnoldsville at 46.0% compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
- The poverty level is higher in Picayune at 21%, compared to 13% in Arnoldsville.
- Picayune has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Arnoldsville.
Demographics
Demographics Arnoldsville vs Picayune provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Arnoldsville | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 38 |
| White | 71 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Arnoldsville vs Picayune
- In Picayune, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 5% in Arnoldsville.
- Arnoldsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 55% in Picayune.
- Both Arnoldsville and Picayune have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Arnoldsville at 12% compared to 2% in Picayune.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Arnoldsville at 12% compared to 5% in Picayune.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arnoldsville and Picayune at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Arnoldsville | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 32.8% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arnoldsville vs Picayune
- In Picayune, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 18.2% in Arnoldsville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Picayune at 24.0% versus 23.9% in Arnoldsville.
- Picayune has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 19.3% in Arnoldsville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Arnoldsville at 17.0% compared to 13.3% in Picayune.
- Picayune has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 32.8% in Arnoldsville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Picayune at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Arnoldsville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Arnoldsville | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (2) | 0.6% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 23.3% (105) | 17.8% (2,108) |
| Less than High School | 40.6% (183) | 11.8% (1,392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (44) | 10.1% (1,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arnoldsville vs Picayune
- In Picayune, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Arnoldsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arnoldsville hold a high school diploma at 23.3% compared to 17.8% in Picayune.
- More residents in Arnoldsville have less than a high school education at 40.6% compared to 11.8% in Picayune.
- In Picayune, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.1% compared to 9.8% in Arnoldsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.