Demographics details for Arma, KS vs Picayune, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arma, KS vs Picayune, MS.
| Data | Arma | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,399 | 11,826 |
| Median Age | 53.0 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $38,947 | $35,649 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Arma vs Picayune
- The population in Picayune is higher at 11,826, compared to 1,399 in Arma.
- Residents in Arma have a higher median age of 53.0 years compared to 38.3 years in Picayune.
- Arma has a higher median income of $38,947 compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Arma at 33.0% compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
- The poverty level is higher in Picayune at 21%, compared to 13% in Arma.
- Picayune has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Arma.
Demographics
Demographics Arma vs Picayune provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Arma | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 38 |
| White | 90 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Arma vs Picayune
- In Picayune, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 1% in Arma.
- Arma has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 55% in Picayune.
- Both Arma and Picayune have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Arma at 5% compared to 2% in Picayune.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Picayune at 5%, compared to 3% in Arma.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Arma at 1% compared to 0% in Picayune.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Arma | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 23.7% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.0% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 41.9% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arma vs Picayune
- More residents in Arma report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.4% in Picayune.
- Depression is more prevalent in Arma at 25.3% compared to 24.0% in Picayune.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Arma at 23.7% compared to 23.3% in Picayune.
- Binge drinking is more common in Arma at 21.0% compared to 13.3% in Picayune.
- Picayune has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 41.9% in Arma.
- Disability percentages are higher in Arma at 28.0% compared to 21.0% in Picayune.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Arma | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (11) | 0.6% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 25.4% (356) | 17.8% (2,108) |
| Less than High School | 8.4% (118) | 11.8% (1,392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (181) | 10.1% (1,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arma vs Picayune
- A higher percentage of residents in Arma have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Picayune.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arma hold a high school diploma at 25.4% compared to 17.8% in Picayune.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Picayune at 11.8%, compared to 8.4% in Arma.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arma hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.9% compared to 10.1% in Picayune.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.