Demographics details for Andrew, IA vs Washington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Andrew, IA vs Washington, NC.
| Data | Andrew | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 378 | 10,828 |
| Median Age | 39.8 years | 48.0 years |
| Median Income | $61,613 | $38,927 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Andrew vs Washington
- The population in Washington is higher at 10,828, compared to 378 in Andrew.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 48.0 years, compared to 39.8 years in Andrew.
- Andrew has a higher median income of $61,613 compared to $38,927 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Andrew at 51.0% compared to 34.0% in Washington.
- The poverty level is higher in Washington at 16%, compared to 9% in Andrew.
- Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 2.5% in Andrew.
Demographics
Demographics Andrew vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Andrew | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 49 |
| White | 98 | 41 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Andrew vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 0% in Andrew.
- Andrew has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 41% in Washington.
- Both Andrew and Washington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 1% in Andrew.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Washington at 3%, compared to 1% in Andrew.
- In Washington, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Andrew.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Andrew | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 18.3% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.4% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Andrew vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.2% in Andrew.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 22.8% versus 18.3% in Andrew.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 17.4% in Andrew.
- Binge drinking is more common in Andrew at 23.4% compared to 14.7% in Washington.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 35.2% in Andrew.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 24.0% compared to 8.0% in Andrew.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Andrew | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (128) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (95) | 19.0% (2,058) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (44) | 13.7% (1,487) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (32) | 10.3% (1,118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Andrew vs Washington
- In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Andrew.
- A higher percentage of residents in Andrew hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 19.0% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 13.7%, compared to 11.6% in Andrew.
- In Washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.3% compared to 8.5% in Andrew.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.