Demographics details for Amana, IA vs Forest lake, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Amana, IA vs Forest lake, MN.
Data | Amana | Forest lake |
---|---|---|
Population | 556 | 20,857 |
Median Age | 48.4 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $59,151 | $91,157 |
Married Families | 56.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Amana vs Forest lake
- The population in Forest lake is higher at 20,857, compared to 556 in Amana.
- Residents in Amana have a higher median age of 48.4 years compared to 37.9 years in Forest lake.
- Forest lake has a higher median income of $91,157, compared to $59,151 in Amana.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Amana at 56.0% compared to 42.0% in Forest lake.
- Amana has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- The unemployment rate in Amana is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Forest lake.
Demographics
Demographics Amana vs Forest lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Amana | Forest lake |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | 78 | 81 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 6 |
Two or More Races | 22 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Amana vs Forest lake
- In Forest lake, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Amana.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Forest lake at 81% compared to 78% in Amana.
- In Forest lake, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Amana.
- Forest lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Amana.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Amana at 22% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Amana and Forest lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Amana | Forest lake |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 14.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 8.8% |
Depression | 19.0% | 24.1% |
Smoking | 14.5% | 15.7% |
Binge Drinking | 22.5% | 21.4% |
Obesity | 35.6% | 32.9% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Amana vs Forest lake
- In Forest lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.7% compared to 14.1% in Amana.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Forest lake at 24.1% versus 19.0% in Amana.
- Forest lake has a higher smoking rate at 15.7% compared to 14.5% in Amana.
- Binge drinking is more common in Amana at 22.5% compared to 21.4% in Forest lake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Amana at 35.6% compared to 32.9% in Forest lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Forest lake at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Amana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Amana | Forest lake |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (101) |
High School Diploma | 11.0% (61) | 14.6% (3,055) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 7.7% (1,615) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 46.2% (257) | 24.6% (5,123) |
Education Levels Comparison: Amana vs Forest lake
- In Forest lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Amana.
- In Forest lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.6% compared to 11.0% in Amana.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest lake at 7.7%, compared to 0.0% in Amana.
- A higher percentage of residents in Amana hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.2% compared to 24.6% in Forest lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.