Demographics details for Alum bank, PA vs Gallup, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Alum bank, PA vs Gallup, NM.
| Data | Alum bank | Gallup |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 197 | 20,932 |
| Median Age | 40.0 years | 34.1 years |
| Median Income | $40,417 | $58,358 |
| Married Families | 21.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Alum bank vs Gallup
- The population in Gallup is higher at 20,932, compared to 197 in Alum bank.
- Residents in Alum bank have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 34.1 years in Gallup.
- Gallup has a higher median income of $58,358, compared to $40,417 in Alum bank.
- In Gallup, the percentage of married families is higher at 28.0%, compared to 21.0% in Alum bank.
- The poverty level is higher in Gallup at 21%, compared to 10% in Alum bank.
- Gallup has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 5.0% in Alum bank.
Demographics
Demographics Alum bank vs Gallup provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Alum bank | Gallup |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 96 | 1 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 33 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 51 |
Demographics Comparison: Alum bank vs Gallup
- In Gallup, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Alum bank.
- Alum bank has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 1% in Gallup.
- In Gallup, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Alum bank.
- Gallup has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 0% in Alum bank.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gallup at 9%, compared to 4% in Alum bank.
- In Gallup, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 51%, compared to 0% in Alum bank.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Alum bank | Gallup |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 25.1% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 21.7% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 12.9% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Alum bank vs Gallup
- More residents in Alum bank report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 18.1% in Gallup.
- Depression is more prevalent in Alum bank at 25.1% compared to 18.5% in Gallup.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Alum bank at 21.7% compared to 18.6% in Gallup.
- Binge drinking is more common in Alum bank at 17.9% compared to 12.9% in Gallup.
- Gallup has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 37.3% in Alum bank.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gallup at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Alum bank.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Alum bank | Gallup |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (152) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (35) | 17.7% (3,703) |
| Less than High School | 8.1% (16) | 11.9% (2,501) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.1% (14) | 14.9% (3,119) |
Education Levels Comparison: Alum bank vs Gallup
- In Gallup, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Alum bank.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alum bank hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 17.7% in Gallup.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallup at 11.9%, compared to 8.1% in Alum bank.
- In Gallup, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 7.1% in Alum bank.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.