Demographics details for Albert lea, MN vs Fort atkinson, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Albert lea, MN vs Fort atkinson, WI.

Data Albert lea Fort atkinson
Population 18,396 12,412
Median Age 44.2 years 42.0 years
Median Income $56,347 $72,215
Married Families 35.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 10% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.2

Population Comparison: Albert lea vs Fort atkinson

  • In Albert lea, the population is higher at 18,396, compared to 12,412 in Fort atkinson.
  • Residents in Albert lea have a higher median age of 44.2 years compared to 42.0 years in Fort atkinson.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher median income of $72,215, compared to $56,347 in Albert lea.
  • In Fort atkinson, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 35.0% in Albert lea.
  • Albert lea has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Fort atkinson.
  • The unemployment rate in Albert lea is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.

Demographics

Demographics Albert lea vs Fort atkinson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Albert lea Fort atkinson
Black 2 Data is updating
White 72 89
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 15 8
Two or More Races 8 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Albert lea vs Fort atkinson

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Albert lea at 2% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort atkinson at 89% compared to 72% in Albert lea.
  • The Asian population is larger in Albert lea at 3% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Albert lea at 15% compared to 8% in Fort atkinson.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Albert lea at 8% compared to 3% in Fort atkinson.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Albert lea and Fort atkinson at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Albert lea Fort atkinson
Mental Health Not Good 16.6% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.3% 10.2%
Depression 24.2% 23.6%
Smoking 22.1% 16.0%
Binge Drinking 18.3% 23.5%
Obesity 38.0% 34.0%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Albert lea vs Fort atkinson

  • More residents in Albert lea report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.2% in Fort atkinson.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Albert lea at 24.2% compared to 23.6% in Fort atkinson.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Albert lea at 22.1% compared to 16.0% in Fort atkinson.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 18.3% in Albert lea.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Albert lea at 38.0% compared to 34.0% in Fort atkinson.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Albert lea at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort atkinson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Albert lea Fort atkinson
No Schooling 2.0% (370) 1.3% (160)
High School Diploma 19.7% (3,624) 20.8% (2,578)
Less than High School 20.0% (3,680) 12.9% (1,595)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.3% (2,086) 19.6% (2,436)

Education Levels Comparison: Albert lea vs Fort atkinson

  • A higher percentage of residents in Albert lea have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.3% in Fort atkinson.
  • In Fort atkinson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 19.7% in Albert lea.
  • More residents in Albert lea have less than a high school education at 20.0% compared to 12.9% in Fort atkinson.
  • In Fort atkinson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 11.3% in Albert lea.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.