Demographics details for Albert lea, MN vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Albert lea, MN vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Albert lea | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,396 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 44.2 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $56,347 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Albert lea vs Coalinga
- In Albert lea, the population is higher at 18,396, compared to 17,024 in Coalinga.
- Residents in Albert lea have a higher median age of 44.2 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976, compared to $56,347 in Albert lea.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Albert lea at 35.0% compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 10% in Albert lea.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.0% in Albert lea.
Demographics
Demographics Albert lea vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Albert lea | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 4 |
| White | 72 | 9 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Albert lea vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Albert lea.
- Albert lea has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- The Asian population is larger in Albert lea at 3% compared to 2% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 15% in Albert lea.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 8% in Albert lea.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Albert lea.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Albert lea | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 22.1% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Albert lea vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.6% in Albert lea.
- Depression is more prevalent in Albert lea at 24.2% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Albert lea at 22.1% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- Binge drinking is more common in Albert lea at 18.3% compared to 15.9% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 38.0% in Albert lea.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Albert lea and Coalinga at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Albert lea | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (370) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 19.7% (3,624) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 20.0% (3,680) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (2,086) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Albert lea vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 2.0% in Albert lea.
- A higher percentage of residents in Albert lea hold a high school diploma at 19.7% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 20.0% in Albert lea.
- A higher percentage of residents in Albert lea hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.3% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.