Demographics details for Alamo, TN vs Clarksville, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Alamo, TN vs Clarksville, AR.
| Data | Alamo | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,317 | 9,555 |
| Median Age | 34.9 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $50,135 | $35,911 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Alamo vs Clarksville
- The population in Clarksville is higher at 9,555, compared to 2,317 in Alamo.
- The median age in Clarksville is higher at 35.3 years, compared to 34.9 years in Alamo.
- Alamo has a higher median income of $50,135 compared to $35,911 in Clarksville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Alamo at 44.0% compared to 36.0% in Clarksville.
- The poverty level is higher in Clarksville at 18%, compared to 14% in Alamo.
- Clarksville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Alamo.
Demographics
Demographics Alamo vs Clarksville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Alamo | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 3 |
| White | 54 | 60 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Alamo vs Clarksville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Alamo at 9% compared to 3% in Clarksville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clarksville at 60% compared to 54% in Alamo.
- In Clarksville, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Alamo.
- Clarksville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 19% in Alamo.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Alamo at 17% compared to 7% in Clarksville.
- In Clarksville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Alamo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Alamo | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 21.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.7% | 16.3% |
| Depression | 29.6% | 27.9% |
| Smoking | 25.9% | 24.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Alamo vs Clarksville
- More residents in Alamo report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 21.0% in Clarksville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Alamo at 29.6% compared to 27.9% in Clarksville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Alamo at 25.9% compared to 24.5% in Clarksville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Alamo at 14.1% compared to 13.9% in Clarksville.
- Clarksville has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 38.9% in Alamo.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksville at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Alamo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Alamo | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (25) | 4.2% (402) |
| High School Diploma | 24.9% (577) | 21.6% (2,064) |
| Less than High School | 26.1% (604) | 28.6% (2,735) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.9% (183) | 8.2% (786) |
Education Levels Comparison: Alamo vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 1.1% in Alamo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alamo hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 21.6% in Clarksville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarksville at 28.6%, compared to 26.1% in Alamo.
- In Clarksville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.2% compared to 7.9% in Alamo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.