Demographics details for Aiken, SC vs Centralia, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Aiken, SC vs Centralia, IL.
| Data | Aiken | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,463 | 11,931 |
| Median Age | 46.4 years | 40.7 years |
| Median Income | $65,712 | $46,468 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Aiken vs Centralia
- In Aiken, the population is higher at 32,463, compared to 11,931 in Centralia.
- Residents in Aiken have a higher median age of 46.4 years compared to 40.7 years in Centralia.
- Aiken has a higher median income of $65,712 compared to $46,468 in Centralia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Aiken at 38.0% compared to 33.0% in Centralia.
- The poverty level is identical in both Aiken and Centralia at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Aiken is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Centralia.
Demographics
Demographics Aiken vs Centralia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Aiken | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 36 | 10 |
| White | 56 | 79 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Aiken vs Centralia
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Aiken at 36% compared to 10% in Centralia.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Centralia at 79% compared to 56% in Aiken.
- Both Aiken and Centralia have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Centralia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Aiken.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Centralia at 5%, compared to 3% in Aiken.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Aiken and Centralia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Aiken | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 22.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 35.7% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Aiken vs Centralia
- In Centralia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.6% in Aiken.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Centralia at 23.9% versus 20.3% in Aiken.
- Centralia has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 15.5% in Aiken.
- Binge drinking is more common in Aiken at 16.5% compared to 16.4% in Centralia.
- Centralia has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 35.7% in Aiken.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Centralia at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Aiken.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Aiken | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (150) | 0.6% (72) |
| High School Diploma | 14.3% (4,646) | 18.8% (2,243) |
| Less than High School | 7.3% (2,369) | 13.7% (1,638) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.6% (9,923) | 12.5% (1,494) |
Education Levels Comparison: Aiken vs Centralia
- In Centralia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Aiken.
- In Centralia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 14.3% in Aiken.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Centralia at 13.7%, compared to 7.3% in Aiken.
- A higher percentage of residents in Aiken hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.6% compared to 12.5% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.