Demographics details for Addison, IL vs Sacramento, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Addison, IL vs Sacramento, CA.
Data | Addison | Sacramento |
---|---|---|
Population | 35,127 | 528,001 |
Median Age | 40.1 years | 35.2 years |
Median Income | $82,547 | $78,954 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Addison vs Sacramento
- The population in Sacramento is higher at 528,001, compared to 35,127 in Addison.
- Residents in Addison have a higher median age of 40.1 years compared to 35.2 years in Sacramento.
- Addison has a higher median income of $82,547 compared to $78,954 in Sacramento.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Addison at 43.0% compared to 33.0% in Sacramento.
- The poverty level is higher in Sacramento at 12%, compared to 5% in Addison.
- The unemployment rate in Addison is higher at 5.6%, compared to 5.0% in Sacramento.
Demographics
Demographics Addison vs Sacramento provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Addison | Sacramento |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 12 |
White | 32 | 26 |
Asian | 9 | 19 |
Hispanic | 42 | 29 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 13 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Addison vs Sacramento
- In Sacramento, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 4% in Addison.
- Addison has a higher percentage of White residents at 32% compared to 26% in Sacramento.
- In Sacramento, the Asian population stands at 19%, greater than 9% in Addison.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Addison at 42% compared to 29% in Sacramento.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sacramento at 13%, compared to 12% in Addison.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Addison and Sacramento at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Addison | Sacramento |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 11.5% |
Depression | 17.7% | 18.3% |
Smoking | 14.9% | 13.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 14.5% |
Obesity | 35.0% | 32.7% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Addison vs Sacramento
- In Sacramento, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 14.2% in Addison.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sacramento at 18.3% versus 17.7% in Addison.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Addison at 14.9% compared to 13.7% in Sacramento.
- Binge drinking is more common in Addison at 15.5% compared to 14.5% in Sacramento.
- Obesity rates are higher in Addison at 35.0% compared to 32.7% in Sacramento.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sacramento at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Addison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Addison | Sacramento |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (744) | 2.7% (14,512) |
High School Diploma | 19.0% (6,671) | 11.7% (62,039) |
Less than High School | 27.2% (9,554) | 14.7% (77,760) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (6,014) | 24.4% (128,743) |
Education Levels Comparison: Addison vs Sacramento
- In Sacramento, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 2.1% in Addison.
- A higher percentage of residents in Addison hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 11.7% in Sacramento.
- More residents in Addison have less than a high school education at 27.2% compared to 14.7% in Sacramento.
- In Sacramento, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 17.1% in Addison.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.