Demographics details for Aberdeen, WA vs Picayune, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Aberdeen, WA vs Picayune, MS.
| Data | Aberdeen | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,113 | 11,826 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $50,008 | $35,649 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Aberdeen vs Picayune
- In Aberdeen, the population is higher at 17,113, compared to 11,826 in Picayune.
- The median age in Picayune is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 37.1 years in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has a higher median income of $50,008 compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Aberdeen at 29.0% compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
- The poverty level is higher in Picayune at 21%, compared to 18% in Aberdeen.
- The unemployment rate in Aberdeen is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Picayune.
Demographics
Demographics Aberdeen vs Picayune provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Aberdeen | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 38 |
| White | 63 | 55 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 21 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 5 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Picayune
- In Picayune, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 1% in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 55% in Picayune.
- The Asian population is larger in Aberdeen at 1% compared to 0% in Picayune.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Aberdeen at 21% compared to 2% in Picayune.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Aberdeen at 12% compared to 5% in Picayune.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Aberdeen at 2% compared to 0% in Picayune.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Aberdeen | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 29.4% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 19.2% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Picayune
- More residents in Aberdeen report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 18.4% in Picayune.
- Depression is more prevalent in Aberdeen at 29.4% compared to 24.0% in Picayune.
- Picayune has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 19.2% in Aberdeen.
- Binge drinking is more common in Aberdeen at 16.0% compared to 13.3% in Picayune.
- Picayune has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 35.6% in Aberdeen.
- Disability percentages are higher in Aberdeen at 22.0% compared to 21.0% in Picayune.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Aberdeen | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (261) | 0.6% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (2,683) | 17.8% (2,108) |
| Less than High School | 19.2% (3,285) | 11.8% (1,392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (1,840) | 10.1% (1,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Aberdeen vs Picayune
- A higher percentage of residents in Aberdeen have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.6% in Picayune.
- In Picayune, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 15.7% in Aberdeen.
- More residents in Aberdeen have less than a high school education at 19.2% compared to 11.8% in Picayune.
- A higher percentage of residents in Aberdeen hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.8% compared to 10.1% in Picayune.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.