Demographics details for Yazoo city, MS vs Mountain home, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Yazoo city, MS vs Mountain home, AR.

Data Yazoo city Mountain home
Population 9,844 13,150
Median Age 31.5 years 41.8 years
Median Income $31,310 $42,281
Married Families 18.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 25% 14%
Unemployment Rate 6.0 3.5

Population Comparison: Yazoo city vs Mountain home

  • The population in Mountain home is higher at 13,150, compared to 9,844 in Yazoo city.
  • The median age in Mountain home is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 31.5 years in Yazoo city.
  • Mountain home has a higher median income of $42,281, compared to $31,310 in Yazoo city.
  • In Mountain home, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 18.0% in Yazoo city.
  • Yazoo city has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 14% in Mountain home.
  • The unemployment rate in Yazoo city is higher at 6.0%, compared to 3.5% in Mountain home.

Demographics

Demographics Yazoo city vs Mountain home provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Yazoo city Mountain home
Black 96 Data is updating
White 3 90
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 4
Two or More Races 1 4
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Yazoo city vs Mountain home

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Yazoo city at 96% compared to 0% in Mountain home.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Mountain home at 90% compared to 3% in Yazoo city.
  • In Mountain home, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Yazoo city.
  • Mountain home has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Yazoo city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mountain home at 4%, compared to 1% in Yazoo city.
  • In Mountain home, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Yazoo city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Yazoo city Mountain home
Mental Health Not Good 21.5% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 19.0% 12.9%
Depression 21.9% 28.5%
Smoking 31.1% 21.1%
Binge Drinking 9.7% 16.3%
Obesity 52.1% 34.3%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Yazoo city vs Mountain home

  • More residents in Yazoo city report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 19.2% in Mountain home.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mountain home at 28.5% versus 21.9% in Yazoo city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Yazoo city at 31.1% compared to 21.1% in Mountain home.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Mountain home at 16.3% compared to 9.7% in Yazoo city.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Yazoo city at 52.1% compared to 34.3% in Mountain home.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mountain home at 22.0% compared to 14.0% in Yazoo city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Yazoo city Mountain home
No Schooling 1.6% (155) 0.7% (87)
High School Diploma 24.5% (2,407) 16.9% (2,225)
Less than High School 17.0% (1,671) 14.2% (1,870)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.5% (642) 15.0% (1,973)

Education Levels Comparison: Yazoo city vs Mountain home

  • A higher percentage of residents in Yazoo city have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.7% in Mountain home.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Yazoo city hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 16.9% in Mountain home.
  • More residents in Yazoo city have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 14.2% in Mountain home.
  • In Mountain home, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 6.5% in Yazoo city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.