Demographics details for Watertown, SD vs Harrington park, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Watertown, SD vs Harrington park, NJ.

Data Watertown Harrington park
Population 23,019 4,954
Median Age 38.9 years 46.9 years
Median Income $61,320 $183,138
Married Families 40.0% 57.0%
Poverty Level 10% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.4

Population Comparison: Watertown vs Harrington park

  • In Watertown, the population is higher at 23,019, compared to 4,954 in Harrington park.
  • The median age in Harrington park is higher at 46.9 years, compared to 38.9 years in Watertown.
  • Harrington park has a higher median income of $183,138, compared to $61,320 in Watertown.
  • In Harrington park, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 40.0% in Watertown.
  • Watertown has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Harrington park.
  • The unemployment rate in Watertown is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.4% in Harrington park.

Demographics

Demographics Watertown vs Harrington park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Watertown Harrington park
Black 1 Data is updating
White 87 70
Asian 1 19
Hispanic 4 5
Two or More Races 4 6
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Watertown vs Harrington park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Watertown at 1% compared to 0% in Harrington park.
  • Watertown has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 70% in Harrington park.
  • In Harrington park, the Asian population stands at 19%, greater than 1% in Watertown.
  • Harrington park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Watertown.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harrington park at 6%, compared to 4% in Watertown.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Watertown at 3% compared to 0% in Harrington park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Watertown Harrington park
Mental Health Not Good 13.4% 12.5%
Physical Health Not Good 9.4% 7.0%
Depression 20.1% 16.7%
Smoking 18.3% 9.6%
Binge Drinking 20.1% 17.5%
Obesity 37.2% 23.0%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Watertown vs Harrington park

  • More residents in Watertown report poor mental health at 13.4% compared to 12.5% in Harrington park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Watertown at 20.1% compared to 16.7% in Harrington park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Watertown at 18.3% compared to 9.6% in Harrington park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Watertown at 20.1% compared to 17.5% in Harrington park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Watertown at 37.2% compared to 23.0% in Harrington park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Watertown at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Harrington park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Watertown Harrington park
No Schooling 1.6% (364) 0.2% (10)
High School Diploma 23.1% (5,313) 7.0% (345)
Less than High School 11.9% (2,738) 2.1% (105)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.7% (3,162) 47.3% (2,342)

Education Levels Comparison: Watertown vs Harrington park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Watertown have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.2% in Harrington park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Watertown hold a high school diploma at 23.1% compared to 7.0% in Harrington park.
  • More residents in Watertown have less than a high school education at 11.9% compared to 2.1% in Harrington park.
  • In Harrington park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.3% compared to 13.7% in Watertown.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.