Demographics details for Waterman, IL vs Junction city, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Waterman, IL vs Junction city, KY.

Data Waterman Junction city
Population 1,427 2,290
Median Age 36.2 years 41.6 years
Median Income $87,292 $38,646
Married Families 50.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 6% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 4.0

Population Comparison: Waterman vs Junction city

  • The population in Junction city is higher at 2,290, compared to 1,427 in Waterman.
  • The median age in Junction city is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 36.2 years in Waterman.
  • Waterman has a higher median income of $87,292 compared to $38,646 in Junction city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Waterman at 50.0% compared to 35.0% in Junction city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Junction city at 15%, compared to 6% in Waterman.
  • The unemployment rate in Waterman is higher at 4.1%, compared to 4.0% in Junction city.

Demographics

Demographics Waterman vs Junction city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Waterman Junction city
Black 2 2
White 78 79
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 10 7
Two or More Races 9 12
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Waterman vs Junction city

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Waterman and Junction city at 2%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Junction city at 79% compared to 78% in Waterman.
  • The Asian population is larger in Waterman at 1% compared to 0% in Junction city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Waterman at 10% compared to 7% in Junction city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Junction city at 12%, compared to 9% in Waterman.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waterman and Junction city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Waterman Junction city
Mental Health Not Good 16.0% 20.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.4% 14.8%
Depression 21.6% 29.5%
Smoking 16.2% 23.5%
Binge Drinking 18.7% 15.1%
Obesity 36.4% 41.2%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 27.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Waterman vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Waterman.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Junction city at 29.5% versus 21.6% in Waterman.
  • Junction city has a higher smoking rate at 23.5% compared to 16.2% in Waterman.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Waterman at 18.7% compared to 15.1% in Junction city.
  • Junction city has higher obesity rates at 41.2% compared to 36.4% in Waterman.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Junction city at 27.0% compared to 10.0% in Waterman.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Waterman Junction city
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.6% (37)
High School Diploma 22.6% (323) 23.9% (547)
Less than High School 8.5% (122) 18.0% (412)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.5% (221) 9.2% (211)

Education Levels Comparison: Waterman vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Waterman.
  • In Junction city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.9% compared to 22.6% in Waterman.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Junction city at 18.0%, compared to 8.5% in Waterman.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Waterman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 9.2% in Junction city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.