Demographics details for Washta, IA vs San luis, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washta, IA vs San luis, AZ.
Data | Washta | San luis |
---|---|---|
Population | 205 | 35,770 |
Median Age | 59.3 years | 31.6 years |
Median Income | $49,500 | $46,747 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.3 | 24.3 |
Population Comparison: Washta vs San luis
- The population in San luis is higher at 35,770, compared to 205 in Washta.
- Residents in Washta have a higher median age of 59.3 years compared to 31.6 years in San luis.
- Washta has a higher median income of $49,500 compared to $46,747 in San luis.
- In San luis, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 32.0% in Washta.
- The poverty level is higher in San luis at 18%, compared to 6% in Washta.
- San luis has a higher unemployment rate at 24.3% compared to 2.3% in Washta.
Demographics
Demographics Washta vs San luis provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Washta | San luis |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 94 | -39 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 93 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 44 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Washta vs San luis
- In San luis, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Washta.
- Washta has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to -39% in San luis.
- Both Washta and San luis have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- San luis has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 93%, compared to 4% in Washta.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San luis at 44%, compared to 2% in Washta.
- In San luis, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Washta.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Washta | San luis |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 18.0% |
Depression | 19.0% | 19.0% |
Smoking | 16.8% | 18.7% |
Binge Drinking | 21.8% | 14.6% |
Obesity | 40.8% | 45.5% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washta vs San luis
- In San luis, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.6% in Washta.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 19.0%.
- San luis has a higher smoking rate at 18.7% compared to 16.8% in Washta.
- Binge drinking is more common in Washta at 21.8% compared to 14.6% in San luis.
- San luis has higher obesity rates at 45.5% compared to 40.8% in Washta.
- Disability percentages are higher in Washta at 17.0% compared to 6.0% in San luis.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Washta | San luis |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.3% (1,167) |
High School Diploma | 30.2% (62) | 9.6% (3,430) |
Less than High School | 17.6% (36) | 54.3% (19,437) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.3% (17) | 5.1% (1,836) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washta vs San luis
- In San luis, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 0.0% in Washta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washta hold a high school diploma at 30.2% compared to 9.6% in San luis.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San luis at 54.3%, compared to 17.6% in Washta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.3% compared to 5.1% in San luis.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.