Demographics details for Walton, IN vs Kings mountain, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Walton, IN vs Kings mountain, NC.
Data | Walton | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Population | 958 | 11,638 |
Median Age | 51.2 years | 41.5 years |
Median Income | $45,750 | $45,301 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Walton vs Kings mountain
- The population in Kings mountain is higher at 11,638, compared to 958 in Walton.
- Residents in Walton have a higher median age of 51.2 years compared to 41.5 years in Kings mountain.
- Walton has a higher median income of $45,750 compared to $45,301 in Kings mountain.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Walton at 37.0% compared to 24.0% in Kings mountain.
- The poverty level is higher in Kings mountain at 11%, compared to 10% in Walton.
- The unemployment rate in Walton is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Kings mountain.
Demographics
Demographics Walton vs Kings mountain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Walton | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 25 |
White | 82 | 68 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 10 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Walton vs Kings mountain
- In Kings mountain, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 0% in Walton.
- Walton has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 68% in Kings mountain.
- Both Walton and Kings mountain have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Walton at 10% compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Walton at 6% compared to 3% in Kings mountain.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Walton and Kings mountain at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Walton | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 13.1% |
Depression | 26.6% | 25.7% |
Smoking | 23.3% | 20.9% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 40.0% | 38.0% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Walton vs Kings mountain
- More residents in Walton report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 18.3% in Kings mountain.
- Depression is more prevalent in Walton at 26.6% compared to 25.7% in Kings mountain.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Walton at 23.3% compared to 20.9% in Kings mountain.
- Binge drinking is more common in Walton at 17.0% compared to 16.3% in Kings mountain.
- Obesity rates are higher in Walton at 40.0% compared to 38.0% in Kings mountain.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kings mountain at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Walton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Walton | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (11) | 0.4% (43) |
High School Diploma | 26.0% (249) | 21.7% (2,528) |
Less than High School | 20.3% (194) | 17.8% (2,071) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.9% (28) | 11.6% (1,353) |
Education Levels Comparison: Walton vs Kings mountain
- A higher percentage of residents in Walton have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Kings mountain.
- A higher percentage of residents in Walton hold a high school diploma at 26.0% compared to 21.7% in Kings mountain.
- More residents in Walton have less than a high school education at 20.3% compared to 17.8% in Kings mountain.
- In Kings mountain, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.6% compared to 2.9% in Walton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.