Demographics details for Waltham, MA vs Washington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waltham, MA vs Washington, NC.
| Data | Waltham | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 64,065 | 10,828 |
| Median Age | 34.7 years | 48.0 years |
| Median Income | $113,443 | $38,927 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Waltham vs Washington
- In Waltham, the population is higher at 64,065, compared to 10,828 in Washington.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 48.0 years, compared to 34.7 years in Waltham.
- Waltham has a higher median income of $113,443 compared to $38,927 in Washington.
- In Washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 33.0% in Waltham.
- The poverty level is higher in Washington at 16%, compared to 7% in Waltham.
- Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.7% in Waltham.
Demographics
Demographics Waltham vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waltham | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 49 |
| White | 56 | 41 |
| Asian | 13 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 15 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Waltham vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 7% in Waltham.
- Waltham has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 41% in Washington.
- The Asian population is larger in Waltham at 13% compared to 0% in Washington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waltham at 15% compared to 6% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waltham at 8% compared to 3% in Washington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waltham and Washington at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waltham | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 10.2% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 24.9% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waltham vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 13.8% in Waltham.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 22.8% versus 20.2% in Waltham.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 10.2% in Waltham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Waltham at 18.7% compared to 14.7% in Washington.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 24.9% in Waltham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 24.0% compared to 9.0% in Waltham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waltham | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (947) | 1.2% (128) |
| High School Diploma | 11.4% (7,272) | 19.0% (2,058) |
| Less than High School | 9.5% (6,108) | 13.7% (1,487) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.1% (25,060) | 10.3% (1,118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waltham vs Washington
- A higher percentage of residents in Waltham have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 1.2% in Washington.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 11.4% in Waltham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 13.7%, compared to 9.5% in Waltham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waltham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.1% compared to 10.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.