Demographics details for Thornton, CO vs Cincinnati, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Thornton, CO vs Cincinnati, OH.
| Data | Thornton | Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 143,282 | 309,513 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 32.9 years |
| Median Income | $95,064 | $49,191 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Thornton vs Cincinnati
- The population in Cincinnati is higher at 309,513, compared to 143,282 in Thornton.
- Residents in Thornton have a higher median age of 33.7 years compared to 32.9 years in Cincinnati.
- Thornton has a higher median income of $95,064 compared to $49,191 in Cincinnati.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Thornton at 40.0% compared to 24.0% in Cincinnati.
- The poverty level is higher in Cincinnati at 17%, compared to 9% in Thornton.
- Cincinnati has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.2% in Thornton.
Demographics
Demographics Thornton vs Cincinnati provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Thornton | Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 40 |
| White | 39 | 46 |
| Asian | 6 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 37 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Thornton vs Cincinnati
- In Cincinnati, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 2% in Thornton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cincinnati at 46% compared to 39% in Thornton.
- The Asian population is larger in Thornton at 6% compared to 3% in Cincinnati.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Thornton at 37% compared to 5% in Cincinnati.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Thornton at 15% compared to 6% in Cincinnati.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Thornton at 1% compared to 0% in Cincinnati.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Thornton | Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 21.6% |
| Smoking | 15.1% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.0% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 39.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Thornton vs Cincinnati
- In Cincinnati, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.1% in Thornton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Thornton at 22.0% compared to 21.6% in Cincinnati.
- Cincinnati has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 15.1% in Thornton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Thornton at 21.0% compared to 18.2% in Cincinnati.
- Cincinnati has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 30.1% in Thornton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cincinnati at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Thornton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Thornton | Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (2,448) | 0.9% (2,632) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (18,983) | 12.5% (38,643) |
| Less than High School | 14.7% (20,999) | 9.6% (29,753) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (27,712) | 26.4% (81,592) |
Education Levels Comparison: Thornton vs Cincinnati
- A higher percentage of residents in Thornton have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.9% in Cincinnati.
- A higher percentage of residents in Thornton hold a high school diploma at 13.2% compared to 12.5% in Cincinnati.
- More residents in Thornton have less than a high school education at 14.7% compared to 9.6% in Cincinnati.
- In Cincinnati, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 19.3% in Thornton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.