Demographics details for Summerfield, NC vs Owatonna, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Summerfield, NC vs Owatonna, MN.
Data | Summerfield | Owatonna |
---|---|---|
Population | 11,111 | 26,470 |
Median Age | 45.1 years | 40.0 years |
Median Income | $148,182 | $78,295 |
Married Families | 52.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Summerfield vs Owatonna
- The population in Owatonna is higher at 26,470, compared to 11,111 in Summerfield.
- Residents in Summerfield have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 40.0 years in Owatonna.
- Summerfield has a higher median income of $148,182 compared to $78,295 in Owatonna.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Summerfield at 52.0% compared to 44.0% in Owatonna.
- The poverty level is identical in both Summerfield and Owatonna at 7%.
- Owatonna has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.4% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Summerfield vs Owatonna provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Summerfield | Owatonna |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 4 |
White | 82 | 83 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Summerfield vs Owatonna
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Summerfield at 5% compared to 4% in Owatonna.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Owatonna at 83% compared to 82% in Summerfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Summerfield at 4% compared to 0% in Owatonna.
- Owatonna has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Owatonna at 6%, compared to 4% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Summerfield and Owatonna at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Summerfield | Owatonna |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.0% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 9.3% |
Depression | 22.6% | 23.9% |
Smoking | 10.6% | 18.0% |
Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 20.6% |
Obesity | 28.7% | 40.3% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Summerfield vs Owatonna
- In Owatonna, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 13.0% in Summerfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Owatonna at 23.9% versus 22.6% in Summerfield.
- Owatonna has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 10.6% in Summerfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Owatonna at 20.6% compared to 19.5% in Summerfield.
- Owatonna has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 28.7% in Summerfield.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Summerfield and Owatonna at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Summerfield | Owatonna |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (109) | 0.7% (174) |
High School Diploma | 8.8% (973) | 16.4% (4,337) |
Less than High School | 6.1% (674) | 7.7% (2,036) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (4,326) | 20.7% (5,477) |
Education Levels Comparison: Summerfield vs Owatonna
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.7% in Owatonna.
- In Owatonna, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.4% compared to 8.8% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Owatonna at 7.7%, compared to 6.1% in Summerfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 20.7% in Owatonna.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.