Demographics details for Spanish fork, UT vs Union grove, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Spanish fork, UT vs Union grove, NC.

Data Spanish fork Union grove
Population 44,102 2,170
Median Age 27.4 years 37.0 years
Median Income $93,989 $65,000
Married Families 43.0% 65.0%
Poverty Level 6% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 4.0

Population Comparison: Spanish fork vs Union grove

  • In Spanish fork, the population is higher at 44,102, compared to 2,170 in Union grove.
  • The median age in Union grove is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
  • Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989 compared to $65,000 in Union grove.
  • In Union grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 65.0%, compared to 43.0% in Spanish fork.
  • The poverty level is higher in Union grove at 12%, compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
  • Union grove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.8% in Spanish fork.

Demographics

Demographics Spanish fork vs Union grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Spanish fork Union grove
Black 1 5
White 80 90
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 12 3
Two or More Races 7 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Union grove

  • In Union grove, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Union grove at 90% compared to 80% in Spanish fork.
  • In Union grove, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Spanish fork.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Spanish fork at 12% compared to 3% in Union grove.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Spanish fork at 7% compared to 0% in Union grove.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Spanish fork and Union grove at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Spanish fork Union grove
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% Data is updating%
Depression 23.8% Data is updating%
Smoking 7.7% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 8.3% Data is updating%
Obesity 31.0% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 8.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Union grove

  • More residents in Spanish fork report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Spanish fork at 23.8% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Spanish fork at 7.7% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Spanish fork at 8.3% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Spanish fork at 31.0% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Spanish fork at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Spanish fork Union grove
No Schooling 0.4% (175) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 9.1% (4,010) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 5.9% (2,583) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.4% (8,546) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Spanish fork vs Union grove

  • A higher percentage of residents in Spanish fork have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Spanish fork hold a high school diploma at 9.1% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • More residents in Spanish fork have less than a high school education at 5.9% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Spanish fork hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.