Demographics details for Snoqualmie, WA vs Draper, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Snoqualmie, WA vs Draper, UT.
| Data | Snoqualmie | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,621 | 50,731 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $186,353 | $126,041 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Draper
- The population in Draper is higher at 50,731, compared to 13,621 in Snoqualmie.
- Residents in Snoqualmie have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 33.6 years in Draper.
- Snoqualmie has a higher median income of $186,353 compared to $126,041 in Draper.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Snoqualmie at 53.0% compared to 45.0% in Draper.
- Snoqualmie has a higher poverty level at 3% compared to 0% in Draper.
- Draper has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Snoqualmie.
Demographics
Demographics Snoqualmie vs Draper provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Snoqualmie | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 77 | 81 |
| Asian | 11 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Draper
- In Draper, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Snoqualmie.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Draper at 81% compared to 77% in Snoqualmie.
- The Asian population is larger in Snoqualmie at 11% compared to 4% in Draper.
- Draper has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 4% in Snoqualmie.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Snoqualmie at 7% compared to 6% in Draper.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Snoqualmie and Draper at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Snoqualmie | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | 7.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 21.9% | 28.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Draper
- In Draper, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 14.1% in Snoqualmie.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Draper at 25.3% versus 23.9% in Snoqualmie.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Snoqualmie at 7.3% compared to 7.1% in Draper.
- Binge drinking is more common in Snoqualmie at 19.3% compared to 16.7% in Draper.
- Draper has higher obesity rates at 28.2% compared to 21.9% in Snoqualmie.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Draper at 6.0% compared to 4.0% in Snoqualmie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Snoqualmie | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (34) | 0.7% (347) |
| High School Diploma | 5.8% (792) | 7.4% (3,771) |
| Less than High School | 1.5% (209) | 4.1% (2,077) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 45.3% (6,177) | 30.1% (15,258) |
Education Levels Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Draper
- In Draper, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Snoqualmie.
- In Draper, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 7.4% compared to 5.8% in Snoqualmie.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Draper at 4.1%, compared to 1.5% in Snoqualmie.
- A higher percentage of residents in Snoqualmie hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.3% compared to 30.1% in Draper.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.