Demographics details for Safford, AZ vs Saddle brook, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Safford, AZ vs Saddle brook, NJ.

Data Safford Saddle brook
Population 10,297 13,930
Median Age 31.6 years 41.2 years
Median Income $64,860 $89,625
Married Families 33.0% 61.2%
Poverty Level Data is updating 7%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 6.3

Population Comparison: Safford vs Saddle brook

  • The population in Saddle brook is higher at 13,930, compared to 10,297 in Safford.
  • The median age in Saddle brook is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 31.6 years in Safford.
  • Saddle brook has a higher median income of $89,625, compared to $64,860 in Safford.
  • In Saddle brook, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.2%, compared to 33.0% in Safford.
  • The poverty level is higher in Saddle brook at 7%, compared to 0% in Safford.
  • Saddle brook has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 3.5% in Safford.

Demographics

Demographics Safford vs Saddle brook provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Safford Saddle brook
Black 2 2.1
White 31 73.6
Asian 1 3.6
Hispanic 50 20.7
Two or More Races 15 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Safford vs Saddle brook

  • In Saddle brook, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2.1% compared to 2% in Safford.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Saddle brook at 73.6% compared to 31% in Safford.
  • In Saddle brook, the Asian population stands at 3.6%, greater than 1% in Safford.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Safford at 50% compared to 20.7% in Saddle brook.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Safford at 15% compared to 0% in Saddle brook.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Safford at 1% compared to 0% in Saddle brook.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Safford Saddle brook
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.2% Data is updating%
Depression 19.9% Data is updating%
Smoking 16.6% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 17.0% Data is updating%
Obesity 35.2% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 14.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Safford vs Saddle brook

  • More residents in Safford report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Safford at 19.9% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Safford at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Safford at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Safford at 35.2% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Safford at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Safford Saddle brook
No Schooling 2.7% (274) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 11.1% (1,147) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 17.7% (1,825) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.6% (1,092) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Safford vs Saddle brook

  • A higher percentage of residents in Safford have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Safford hold a high school diploma at 11.1% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.
  • More residents in Safford have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Safford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.6% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.