Demographics details for Rutherford, NJ vs Social circle, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rutherford, NJ vs Social circle, GA.
| Data | Rutherford | Social circle |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,662 | 5,265 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $128,576 | $68,333 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Rutherford vs Social circle
- In Rutherford, the population is higher at 18,662, compared to 5,265 in Social circle.
- Residents in Rutherford have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 36.8 years in Social circle.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576 compared to $68,333 in Social circle.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rutherford at 42.0% compared to 41.0% in Social circle.
- The poverty level is higher in Social circle at 10%, compared to 9% in Rutherford.
- Social circle has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in Rutherford.
Demographics
Demographics Rutherford vs Social circle provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rutherford | Social circle |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 31 |
| White | 49 | 67 |
| Asian | 16 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 21 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rutherford vs Social circle
- In Social circle, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 31% compared to 3% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Social circle at 67% compared to 49% in Rutherford.
- The Asian population is larger in Rutherford at 16% compared to 0% in Social circle.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rutherford at 21% compared to 2% in Social circle.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rutherford at 11% compared to 0% in Social circle.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rutherford and Social circle at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rutherford | Social circle |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 10.8% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 24.9% | 38.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rutherford vs Social circle
- In Social circle, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Social circle at 22.4% versus 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Social circle has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rutherford at 17.6% compared to 15.3% in Social circle.
- Social circle has higher obesity rates at 38.3% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Social circle at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Rutherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rutherford | Social circle |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (161) | 0.7% (39) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (2,318) | 16.6% (872) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (1,175) | 8.8% (462) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (7,259) | 17.4% (914) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rutherford vs Social circle
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Social circle.
- In Social circle, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.6% compared to 12.4% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Social circle at 8.8%, compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 17.4% in Social circle.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.