Demographics details for Rutherford, NJ vs Gardena, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rutherford, NJ vs Gardena, CA.
| Data | Rutherford | Gardena |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,662 | 58,843 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 40.1 years |
| Median Income | $128,576 | $75,443 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Rutherford vs Gardena
- The population in Gardena is higher at 58,843, compared to 18,662 in Rutherford.
- Residents in Rutherford have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 40.1 years in Gardena.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576 compared to $75,443 in Gardena.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rutherford at 42.0% compared to 37.0% in Gardena.
- The poverty level is higher in Gardena at 15%, compared to 9% in Rutherford.
- Gardena has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.4% in Rutherford.
Demographics
Demographics Rutherford vs Gardena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rutherford | Gardena |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 20 |
| White | 49 | -5 |
| Asian | 16 | 25 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 44 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Rutherford vs Gardena
- In Gardena, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 3% in Rutherford.
- Rutherford has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to -5% in Gardena.
- In Gardena, the Asian population stands at 25%, greater than 16% in Rutherford.
- Gardena has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 44%, compared to 21% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gardena at 15%, compared to 11% in Rutherford.
- In Gardena, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Rutherford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rutherford | Gardena |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 13.8% |
| Smoking | 10.8% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 24.9% | 28.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rutherford vs Gardena
- In Gardena, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rutherford at 17.0% compared to 13.8% in Gardena.
- Gardena has a higher smoking rate at 11.3% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rutherford at 17.6% compared to 13.5% in Gardena.
- Gardena has higher obesity rates at 28.1% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gardena at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Rutherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rutherford | Gardena |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (161) | 3.0% (1,776) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (2,318) | 15.0% (8,829) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (1,175) | 26.5% (15,605) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (7,259) | 19.8% (11,669) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rutherford vs Gardena
- In Gardena, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.9% in Rutherford.
- In Gardena, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 12.4% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gardena at 26.5%, compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 19.8% in Gardena.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.