Demographics details for Quimby, IA vs Fond du lac, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Quimby, IA vs Fond du lac, WI.
| Data | Quimby | Fond du lac |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 244 | 44,339 |
| Median Age | 50.4 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $57,500 | $58,675 |
| Married Families | 61.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | Data is updating | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Quimby vs Fond du lac
- The population in Fond du lac is higher at 44,339, compared to 244 in Quimby.
- Residents in Quimby have a higher median age of 50.4 years compared to 37.9 years in Fond du lac.
- Fond du lac has a higher median income of $58,675, compared to $57,500 in Quimby.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Quimby at 61.0% compared to 36.0% in Fond du lac.
- The poverty level is higher in Fond du lac at 8%, compared to 0% in Quimby.
- Fond du lac has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 0.0% in Quimby.
Demographics
Demographics Quimby vs Fond du lac provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Quimby | Fond du lac |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 76 | 81 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 24 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Quimby vs Fond du lac
- In Fond du lac, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Quimby.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fond du lac at 81% compared to 76% in Quimby.
- In Fond du lac, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Quimby.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Quimby at 24% compared to 8% in Fond du lac.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fond du lac at 5%, compared to 0% in Quimby.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Quimby and Fond du lac at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Quimby | Fond du lac |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 16.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.7% | 23.0% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Quimby vs Fond du lac
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Quimby and Fond du lac at 15.6%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fond du lac at 23.7% versus 18.9% in Quimby.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Quimby at 17.5% compared to 16.5% in Fond du lac.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fond du lac at 23.0% compared to 21.7% in Quimby.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 41.1%.
- Disability percentages are higher in Quimby at 22.0% compared to 14.0% in Fond du lac.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Quimby | Fond du lac |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (370) |
| High School Diploma | 41.8% (102) | 20.6% (9,143) |
| Less than High School | 30.3% (74) | 11.8% (5,248) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (24) | 14.5% (6,416) |
Education Levels Comparison: Quimby vs Fond du lac
- In Fond du lac, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Quimby.
- A higher percentage of residents in Quimby hold a high school diploma at 41.8% compared to 20.6% in Fond du lac.
- More residents in Quimby have less than a high school education at 30.3% compared to 11.8% in Fond du lac.
- In Fond du lac, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 9.8% in Quimby.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.