Demographics details for Pulaski, VA vs Menomonee falls, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pulaski, VA vs Menomonee falls, WI.

Data Pulaski Menomonee falls
Population 33,706 39,246
Median Age 47.2 years 41.9 years
Median Income $59,740 $96,986
Married Families 43.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 12% 5%
Unemployment Rate 2.9 2.8

Population Comparison: Pulaski vs Menomonee falls

  • The population in Menomonee falls is higher at 39,246, compared to 33,706 in Pulaski.
  • Residents in Pulaski have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 41.9 years in Menomonee falls.
  • Menomonee falls has a higher median income of $96,986, compared to $59,740 in Pulaski.
  • In Menomonee falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 43.0% in Pulaski.
  • Pulaski has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Menomonee falls.
  • The unemployment rate in Pulaski is higher at 2.9%, compared to 2.8% in Menomonee falls.

Demographics

Demographics Pulaski vs Menomonee falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pulaski Menomonee falls
Black 5 4
White 90 82
Asian 1 5
Hispanic 2 5
Two or More Races 2 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pulaski vs Menomonee falls

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pulaski at 5% compared to 4% in Menomonee falls.
  • Pulaski has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 82% in Menomonee falls.
  • In Menomonee falls, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Pulaski.
  • Menomonee falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Pulaski.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Menomonee falls at 4%, compared to 2% in Pulaski.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pulaski and Menomonee falls at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pulaski Menomonee falls
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 12.7%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 7.7%
Depression 24.8% 20.0%
Smoking 18.5% 11.6%
Binge Drinking 18.2% 25.0%
Obesity 37.7% 33.4%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pulaski vs Menomonee falls

  • More residents in Pulaski report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 12.7% in Menomonee falls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Pulaski at 24.8% compared to 20.0% in Menomonee falls.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Pulaski at 18.5% compared to 11.6% in Menomonee falls.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Menomonee falls at 25.0% compared to 18.2% in Pulaski.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Pulaski at 37.7% compared to 33.4% in Menomonee falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Pulaski at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Menomonee falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pulaski Menomonee falls
No Schooling 1.0% (331) 0.3% (117)
High School Diploma 21.0% (7,088) 14.9% (5,834)
Less than High School 14.0% (4,706) 4.9% (1,936)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.0% (5,382) 33.4% (13,122)

Education Levels Comparison: Pulaski vs Menomonee falls

  • A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Menomonee falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 14.9% in Menomonee falls.
  • More residents in Pulaski have less than a high school education at 14.0% compared to 4.9% in Menomonee falls.
  • In Menomonee falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.4% compared to 16.0% in Pulaski.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.