Demographics details for Prescott, AZ vs Placerville, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Prescott, AZ vs Placerville, CA.
Data | Prescott | Placerville |
---|---|---|
Population | 47,603 | 10,664 |
Median Age | 60.5 years | 43.4 years |
Median Income | $66,330 | $68,640 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Prescott vs Placerville
- In Prescott, the population is higher at 47,603, compared to 10,664 in Placerville.
- Residents in Prescott have a higher median age of 60.5 years compared to 43.4 years in Placerville.
- Placerville has a higher median income of $68,640, compared to $66,330 in Prescott.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Prescott at 47.0% compared to 38.0% in Placerville.
- The poverty level is higher in Placerville at 12%, compared to 10% in Prescott.
- Placerville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.0% in Prescott.
Demographics
Demographics Prescott vs Placerville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Prescott | Placerville |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 84 | 68 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 8 | 22 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Prescott vs Placerville
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Prescott and Placerville at 1%.
- Prescott has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 68% in Placerville.
- The Asian population is larger in Prescott at 2% compared to 1% in Placerville.
- Placerville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 8% in Prescott.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Placerville at 7%, compared to 4% in Prescott.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Prescott and Placerville at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Prescott | Placerville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 11.0% |
Depression | 21.7% | 23.2% |
Smoking | 14.9% | 13.4% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 18.3% |
Obesity | 26.1% | 30.0% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Prescott vs Placerville
- In Placerville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.8% in Prescott.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Placerville at 23.2% versus 21.7% in Prescott.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Prescott at 14.9% compared to 13.4% in Placerville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Placerville at 18.3% compared to 17.5% in Prescott.
- Placerville has higher obesity rates at 30.0% compared to 26.1% in Prescott.
- Disability percentages are higher in Prescott at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Placerville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Prescott | Placerville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (139) | 1.3% (134) |
High School Diploma | 12.1% (5,770) | 17.1% (1,824) |
Less than High School | 6.2% (2,941) | 16.8% (1,795) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.1% (14,785) | 19.1% (2,033) |
Education Levels Comparison: Prescott vs Placerville
- In Placerville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.3% in Prescott.
- In Placerville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 12.1% in Prescott.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Placerville at 16.8%, compared to 6.2% in Prescott.
- A higher percentage of residents in Prescott hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 19.1% in Placerville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.