Demographics details for Port charlotte, FL vs Goose creek, SC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port charlotte, FL vs Goose creek, SC.

Data Port charlotte Goose creek
Population 63,913 47,618
Median Age 55.6 years 32.0 years
Median Income $58,799 $84,041
Married Families 45.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 11% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.3

Population Comparison: Port charlotte vs Goose creek

  • In Port charlotte, the population is higher at 63,913, compared to 47,618 in Goose creek.
  • Residents in Port charlotte have a higher median age of 55.6 years compared to 32.0 years in Goose creek.
  • Goose creek has a higher median income of $84,041, compared to $58,799 in Port charlotte.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Port charlotte at 45.0% compared to 37.0% in Goose creek.
  • Port charlotte has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Goose creek.
  • Goose creek has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 4.2% in Port charlotte.

Demographics

Demographics Port charlotte vs Goose creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port charlotte Goose creek
Black 7 20
White 71 63
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 12 8
Two or More Races 8 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Port charlotte vs Goose creek

  • In Goose creek, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 7% in Port charlotte.
  • Port charlotte has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 63% in Goose creek.
  • In Goose creek, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Port charlotte.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Port charlotte at 12% compared to 8% in Goose creek.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Port charlotte at 8% compared to 6% in Goose creek.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port charlotte and Goose creek at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port charlotte Goose creek
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% 16.9%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 10.8%
Depression 20.7% 19.2%
Smoking 22.0% 15.8%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 19.4%
Obesity 31.0% 38.3%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port charlotte vs Goose creek

  • More residents in Port charlotte report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 16.9% in Goose creek.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Port charlotte at 20.7% compared to 19.2% in Goose creek.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port charlotte at 22.0% compared to 15.8% in Goose creek.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Goose creek at 19.4% compared to 16.6% in Port charlotte.
  • Goose creek has higher obesity rates at 38.3% compared to 31.0% in Port charlotte.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port charlotte at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in Goose creek.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port charlotte Goose creek
No Schooling 1.4% (901) 0.5% (235)
High School Diploma 24.2% (15,437) 12.6% (6,002)
Less than High School 14.7% (9,408) 6.9% (3,266)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.0% (10,215) 16.2% (7,733)

Education Levels Comparison: Port charlotte vs Goose creek

  • A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Goose creek.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 12.6% in Goose creek.
  • More residents in Port charlotte have less than a high school education at 14.7% compared to 6.9% in Goose creek.
  • In Goose creek, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 16.0% in Port charlotte.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.