Demographics details for Pea ridge, AR vs Reedsport, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pea ridge, AR vs Reedsport, OR.
| Data | Pea ridge | Reedsport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,852 | 4,320 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 52.0 years |
| Median Income | $93,113 | $48,329 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Pea ridge vs Reedsport
- In Pea ridge, the population is higher at 7,852, compared to 4,320 in Reedsport.
- The median age in Reedsport is higher at 52.0 years, compared to 35.6 years in Pea ridge.
- Pea ridge has a higher median income of $93,113 compared to $48,329 in Reedsport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pea ridge at 42.0% compared to 40.0% in Reedsport.
- The poverty level is higher in Reedsport at 13%, compared to 8% in Pea ridge.
- Reedsport has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Pea ridge.
Demographics
Demographics Pea ridge vs Reedsport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pea ridge | Reedsport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 70 | 92 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Pea ridge vs Reedsport
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pea ridge at 4% compared to 0% in Reedsport.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Reedsport at 92% compared to 70% in Pea ridge.
- The Asian population is larger in Pea ridge at 1% compared to 0% in Reedsport.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pea ridge at 9% compared to 3% in Reedsport.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pea ridge at 15% compared to 3% in Reedsport.
- In Reedsport, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Pea ridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pea ridge | Reedsport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 27.2% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 19.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pea ridge vs Reedsport
- In Reedsport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 18.0% in Pea ridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Reedsport at 27.2% versus 25.0% in Pea ridge.
- Reedsport has a higher smoking rate at 19.1% compared to 17.9% in Pea ridge.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pea ridge at 17.0% compared to 16.1% in Reedsport.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pea ridge at 34.8% compared to 34.6% in Reedsport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Reedsport at 23.0% compared to 12.0% in Pea ridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pea ridge | Reedsport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (23) | 0.9% (40) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (1,390) | 23.0% (995) |
| Less than High School | 9.8% (773) | 18.4% (796) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (1,131) | 7.8% (339) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pea ridge vs Reedsport
- In Reedsport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.3% in Pea ridge.
- In Reedsport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 17.7% in Pea ridge.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Reedsport at 18.4%, compared to 9.8% in Pea ridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pea ridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 7.8% in Reedsport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.