Demographics details for Parkman, WY vs Ashburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parkman, WY vs Ashburn, GA.
| Data | Parkman | Ashburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 473 | 4,174 |
| Median Age | 64.0 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $61,216 | $35,987 |
| Married Families | 93.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Parkman vs Ashburn
- The population in Ashburn is higher at 4,174, compared to 473 in Parkman.
- Residents in Parkman have a higher median age of 64.0 years compared to 39.9 years in Ashburn.
- Parkman has a higher median income of $61,216 compared to $35,987 in Ashburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parkman at 93.0% compared to 30.0% in Ashburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Ashburn at 12%, compared to 5% in Parkman.
- Ashburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Parkman.
Demographics
Demographics Parkman vs Ashburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parkman | Ashburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 71 |
| White | 100 | 22 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parkman vs Ashburn
- In Ashburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 71% compared to 0% in Parkman.
- Parkman has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 22% in Ashburn.
- Both Parkman and Ashburn have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Ashburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Parkman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ashburn at 2%, compared to 0% in Parkman.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parkman and Ashburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parkman | Ashburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 16.1% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 24.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 12.1% |
| Obesity | 30.3% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 39.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parkman vs Ashburn
- In Ashburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 14.9% in Parkman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ashburn at 21.2% versus 20.5% in Parkman.
- Ashburn has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 16.9% in Parkman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parkman at 19.5% compared to 12.1% in Ashburn.
- Ashburn has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 30.3% in Parkman.
- Disability percentages are higher in Parkman at 39.0% compared to 18.0% in Ashburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parkman | Ashburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (8) |
| High School Diploma | 20.9% (99) | 19.0% (791) |
| Less than High School | 9.3% (44) | 21.0% (875) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.1% (152) | 7.3% (304) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parkman vs Ashburn
- In Ashburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Parkman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parkman hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 19.0% in Ashburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ashburn at 21.0%, compared to 9.3% in Parkman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parkman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.1% compared to 7.3% in Ashburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.