Demographics details for Panaca, NV vs Shirley, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Panaca, NV vs Shirley, NY.
Data | Panaca | Shirley |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,039 | 26,498 |
Median Age | 34.3 years | 40.4 years |
Median Income | $68,073 | $109,821 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Panaca vs Shirley
- The population in Shirley is higher at 26,498, compared to 1,039 in Panaca.
- The median age in Shirley is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 34.3 years in Panaca.
- Shirley has a higher median income of $109,821, compared to $68,073 in Panaca.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Panaca at 45.0% compared to 37.0% in Shirley.
- Panaca has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Shirley.
- The unemployment rate in Panaca is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Shirley.
Demographics
Demographics Panaca vs Shirley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Panaca | Shirley |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 8 |
White | 92 | 56 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 23 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
American Indian | 5 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Panaca vs Shirley
- In Shirley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Panaca.
- Panaca has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 56% in Shirley.
- In Shirley, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Panaca.
- Shirley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 0% in Panaca.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shirley at 8%, compared to 3% in Panaca.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Panaca at 5% compared to 0% in Shirley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Panaca | Shirley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 10.7% |
Depression | 22.8% | 21.1% |
Smoking | 18.0% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 16.0% |
Obesity | 33.4% | 32.0% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Panaca vs Shirley
- More residents in Panaca report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.3% in Shirley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Panaca at 22.8% compared to 21.1% in Shirley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Panaca at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Shirley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Panaca at 18.2% compared to 16.0% in Shirley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Panaca at 33.4% compared to 32.0% in Shirley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shirley at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in Panaca.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Panaca | Shirley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.1% (555) |
High School Diploma | 20.0% (208) | 22.2% (5,874) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 13.4% (3,542) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.3% (169) | 13.4% (3,547) |
Education Levels Comparison: Panaca vs Shirley
- In Shirley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Panaca.
- In Shirley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.2% compared to 20.0% in Panaca.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shirley at 13.4%, compared to 0.0% in Panaca.
- A higher percentage of residents in Panaca hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 13.4% in Shirley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.