Demographics details for Norwalk, CT vs Fredericksburg, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norwalk, CT vs Fredericksburg, VA.
Data | Norwalk | Fredericksburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 91,401 | 28,757 |
Median Age | 40.0 years | 30.9 years |
Median Income | $97,879 | $83,445 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Norwalk vs Fredericksburg
- In Norwalk, the population is higher at 91,401, compared to 28,757 in Fredericksburg.
- Residents in Norwalk have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 30.9 years in Fredericksburg.
- Norwalk has a higher median income of $97,879 compared to $83,445 in Fredericksburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Norwalk at 40.0% compared to 30.0% in Fredericksburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Fredericksburg at 10%, compared to 8% in Norwalk.
- Fredericksburg has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 2.6% in Norwalk.
Demographics
Demographics Norwalk vs Fredericksburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Norwalk | Fredericksburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | 21 |
White | 35 | 54 |
Asian | 4 | 4 |
Hispanic | 31 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Norwalk vs Fredericksburg
- In Fredericksburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 18% in Norwalk.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fredericksburg at 54% compared to 35% in Norwalk.
- Both Norwalk and Fredericksburg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Norwalk at 31% compared to 12% in Fredericksburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Norwalk at 12% compared to 9% in Fredericksburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Norwalk and Fredericksburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Norwalk | Fredericksburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.0% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 10.9% |
Depression | 17.8% | 22.7% |
Smoking | 12.2% | 15.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 25.9% | 36.7% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norwalk vs Fredericksburg
- In Fredericksburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 14.0% in Norwalk.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fredericksburg at 22.7% versus 17.8% in Norwalk.
- Fredericksburg has a higher smoking rate at 15.2% compared to 12.2% in Norwalk.
- Binge drinking is more common in Norwalk at 16.3% compared to 16.2% in Fredericksburg.
- Fredericksburg has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 25.9% in Norwalk.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fredericksburg at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Norwalk.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Norwalk | Fredericksburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (1,895) | 0.5% (140) |
High School Diploma | 13.8% (12,648) | 10.6% (3,055) |
Less than High School | 15.1% (13,786) | 7.2% (2,074) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.8% (28,160) | 25.5% (7,346) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norwalk vs Fredericksburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Norwalk have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.5% in Fredericksburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norwalk hold a high school diploma at 13.8% compared to 10.6% in Fredericksburg.
- More residents in Norwalk have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 7.2% in Fredericksburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norwalk hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.8% compared to 25.5% in Fredericksburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.