Demographics details for Moorpark, CA vs Tappahannock, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moorpark, CA vs Tappahannock, VA.
| Data | Moorpark | Tappahannock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,514 | 2,192 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 48.2 years |
| Median Income | $143,218 | $40,703 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Moorpark vs Tappahannock
- In Moorpark, the population is higher at 35,514, compared to 2,192 in Tappahannock.
- The median age in Tappahannock is higher at 48.2 years, compared to 38.8 years in Moorpark.
- Moorpark has a higher median income of $143,218 compared to $40,703 in Tappahannock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Moorpark at 47.0% compared to 27.0% in Tappahannock.
- The poverty level is higher in Tappahannock at 12%, compared to 8% in Moorpark.
- The unemployment rate in Moorpark is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.0% in Tappahannock.
Demographics
Demographics Moorpark vs Tappahannock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Moorpark | Tappahannock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 42 |
| White | 38 | 51 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 34 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Moorpark vs Tappahannock
- In Tappahannock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 3% in Moorpark.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tappahannock at 51% compared to 38% in Moorpark.
- The Asian population is larger in Moorpark at 7% compared to 1% in Tappahannock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Moorpark at 34% compared to 2% in Tappahannock.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Moorpark at 17% compared to 4% in Tappahannock.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Moorpark at 1% compared to 0% in Tappahannock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Moorpark | Tappahannock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 17.6% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 9.2% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 24.7% | 44.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moorpark vs Tappahannock
- In Tappahannock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 13.8% in Moorpark.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tappahannock at 22.4% versus 17.6% in Moorpark.
- Tappahannock has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 9.2% in Moorpark.
- Binge drinking is more common in Moorpark at 17.8% compared to 14.1% in Tappahannock.
- Tappahannock has higher obesity rates at 44.7% compared to 24.7% in Moorpark.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tappahannock at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Moorpark.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Moorpark | Tappahannock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (300) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 9.3% (3,304) | 18.8% (411) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (4,201) | 8.4% (185) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.1% (10,699) | 14.1% (309) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moorpark vs Tappahannock
- A higher percentage of residents in Moorpark have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Tappahannock.
- In Tappahannock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 9.3% in Moorpark.
- More residents in Moorpark have less than a high school education at 11.8% compared to 8.4% in Tappahannock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moorpark hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 14.1% in Tappahannock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.