Demographics details for Middle river, MD vs Fairhope, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Middle river, MD vs Fairhope, AL.
| Data | Middle river | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,155 | 23,859 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 44.9 years |
| Median Income | $72,970 | $85,456 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Middle river vs Fairhope
- In Middle river, the population is higher at 31,155, compared to 23,859 in Fairhope.
- The median age in Fairhope is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 36.7 years in Middle river.
- Fairhope has a higher median income of $85,456, compared to $72,970 in Middle river.
- In Fairhope, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 33.0% in Middle river.
- The poverty level is identical in both Middle river and Fairhope at 8%.
- The unemployment rate in Middle river is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.4% in Fairhope.
Demographics
Demographics Middle river vs Fairhope provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Middle river | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 4 |
| White | 51 | 89 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Middle river vs Fairhope
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Middle river at 29% compared to 4% in Fairhope.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairhope at 89% compared to 51% in Middle river.
- The Asian population is larger in Middle river at 7% compared to 1% in Fairhope.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Middle river at 8% compared to 4% in Fairhope.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Middle river at 5% compared to 2% in Fairhope.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Middle river and Fairhope at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Middle river | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 12.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 38.7% | 34.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Middle river vs Fairhope
- More residents in Middle river report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.8% in Fairhope.
- Depression is more prevalent in Middle river at 24.1% compared to 22.6% in Fairhope.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Middle river at 17.2% compared to 12.0% in Fairhope.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairhope at 18.4% compared to 15.0% in Middle river.
- Obesity rates are higher in Middle river at 38.7% compared to 34.7% in Fairhope.
- Disability percentages are higher in Middle river at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Fairhope.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Middle river | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (818) | 0.3% (75) |
| High School Diploma | 20.1% (6,254) | 7.1% (1,686) |
| Less than High School | 14.8% (4,616) | 4.6% (1,098) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (6,048) | 35.8% (8,552) |
Education Levels Comparison: Middle river vs Fairhope
- A higher percentage of residents in Middle river have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.3% in Fairhope.
- A higher percentage of residents in Middle river hold a high school diploma at 20.1% compared to 7.1% in Fairhope.
- More residents in Middle river have less than a high school education at 14.8% compared to 4.6% in Fairhope.
- In Fairhope, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 19.4% in Middle river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.