Demographics details for Menomonee falls, WI vs Snoqualmie, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Menomonee falls, WI vs Snoqualmie, WA.

Data Menomonee falls Snoqualmie
Population 39,246 13,621
Median Age 41.9 years 38.6 years
Median Income $96,986 $186,353
Married Families 46.0% 53.0%
Poverty Level 5% 3%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Menomonee falls vs Snoqualmie

  • In Menomonee falls, the population is higher at 39,246, compared to 13,621 in Snoqualmie.
  • Residents in Menomonee falls have a higher median age of 41.9 years compared to 38.6 years in Snoqualmie.
  • Snoqualmie has a higher median income of $186,353, compared to $96,986 in Menomonee falls.
  • In Snoqualmie, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 46.0% in Menomonee falls.
  • Menomonee falls has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 3% in Snoqualmie.
  • Snoqualmie has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.8% in Menomonee falls.

Demographics

Demographics Menomonee falls vs Snoqualmie provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Menomonee falls Snoqualmie
Black 4 1
White 82 77
Asian 5 11
Hispanic 5 4
Two or More Races 4 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Menomonee falls vs Snoqualmie

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Menomonee falls at 4% compared to 1% in Snoqualmie.
  • Menomonee falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 77% in Snoqualmie.
  • In Snoqualmie, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 5% in Menomonee falls.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Menomonee falls at 5% compared to 4% in Snoqualmie.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Snoqualmie at 7%, compared to 4% in Menomonee falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Menomonee falls and Snoqualmie at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Menomonee falls Snoqualmie
Mental Health Not Good 12.7% 14.1%
Physical Health Not Good 7.7% 7.4%
Depression 20.0% 23.9%
Smoking 11.6% 7.3%
Binge Drinking 25.0% 19.3%
Obesity 33.4% 21.9%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 4.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Menomonee falls vs Snoqualmie

  • In Snoqualmie, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.1% compared to 12.7% in Menomonee falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Snoqualmie at 23.9% versus 20.0% in Menomonee falls.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Menomonee falls at 11.6% compared to 7.3% in Snoqualmie.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Menomonee falls at 25.0% compared to 19.3% in Snoqualmie.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Menomonee falls at 33.4% compared to 21.9% in Snoqualmie.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Menomonee falls at 10.0% compared to 4.0% in Snoqualmie.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Menomonee falls Snoqualmie
No Schooling 0.3% (117) 0.2% (34)
High School Diploma 14.9% (5,834) 5.8% (792)
Less than High School 4.9% (1,936) 1.5% (209)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 33.4% (13,122) 45.3% (6,177)

Education Levels Comparison: Menomonee falls vs Snoqualmie

  • A higher percentage of residents in Menomonee falls have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Snoqualmie.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Menomonee falls hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 5.8% in Snoqualmie.
  • More residents in Menomonee falls have less than a high school education at 4.9% compared to 1.5% in Snoqualmie.
  • In Snoqualmie, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.3% compared to 33.4% in Menomonee falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.