Demographics details for Mc clure, OH vs Grayling, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mc clure, OH vs Grayling, MI.
| Data | Mc clure | Grayling |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 693 | 1,917 |
| Median Age | 30.5 years | 48.8 years |
| Median Income | $55,938 | $30,417 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Mc clure vs Grayling
- The population in Grayling is higher at 1,917, compared to 693 in Mc clure.
- The median age in Grayling is higher at 48.8 years, compared to 30.5 years in Mc clure.
- Mc clure has a higher median income of $55,938 compared to $30,417 in Grayling.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mc clure at 37.0% compared to 26.0% in Grayling.
- The poverty level is higher in Grayling at 16%, compared to 12% in Mc clure.
- The unemployment rate in Mc clure is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Grayling.
Demographics
Demographics Mc clure vs Grayling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mc clure | Grayling |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 65 | 88 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mc clure vs Grayling
- In Grayling, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Mc clure.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grayling at 88% compared to 65% in Mc clure.
- The Asian population is larger in Mc clure at 4% compared to 1% in Grayling.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mc clure at 16% compared to 7% in Grayling.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mc clure at 15% compared to 3% in Grayling.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mc clure and Grayling at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mc clure | Grayling |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 22.4% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.9% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mc clure vs Grayling
- In Grayling, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.4% in Mc clure.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grayling at 26.4% versus 22.4% in Mc clure.
- Grayling has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 18.2% in Mc clure.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mc clure at 19.9% compared to 19.0% in Grayling.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mc clure at 40.2% compared to 37.4% in Grayling.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Mc clure and Grayling at 22.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mc clure | Grayling |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (2) | 0.7% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 28.6% (198) | 17.3% (332) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (123) | 18.2% (348) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.5% (38) | 10.3% (197) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mc clure vs Grayling
- In Grayling, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Mc clure.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mc clure hold a high school diploma at 28.6% compared to 17.3% in Grayling.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grayling at 18.2%, compared to 17.7% in Mc clure.
- In Grayling, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.3% compared to 5.5% in Mc clure.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.