Demographics details for Leominster, MA vs Hillsboro, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leominster, MA vs Hillsboro, OR.
Data | Leominster | Hillsboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 43,646 | 107,299 |
Median Age | 43.0 years | 34.5 years |
Median Income | $75,620 | $98,891 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Leominster vs Hillsboro
- The population in Hillsboro is higher at 107,299, compared to 43,646 in Leominster.
- Residents in Leominster have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 34.5 years in Hillsboro.
- Hillsboro has a higher median income of $98,891, compared to $75,620 in Leominster.
- In Hillsboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 38.0% in Leominster.
- The poverty level is identical in both Leominster and Hillsboro at 9%.
- The unemployment rate in Leominster is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.6% in Hillsboro.
Demographics
Demographics Leominster vs Hillsboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Leominster | Hillsboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 3 |
White | 67 | 47 |
Asian | 3 | 11 |
Hispanic | 14 | 24 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 14 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Leominster vs Hillsboro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Leominster at 6% compared to 3% in Hillsboro.
- Leominster has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 47% in Hillsboro.
- In Hillsboro, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 3% in Leominster.
- Hillsboro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 14% in Leominster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hillsboro at 14%, compared to 10% in Leominster.
- In Hillsboro, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Leominster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Leominster | Hillsboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 16.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 10.0% |
Depression | 23.5% | 23.2% |
Smoking | 15.5% | 11.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 32.8% | 32.5% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leominster vs Hillsboro
- More residents in Leominster report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.0% in Hillsboro.
- Depression is more prevalent in Leominster at 23.5% compared to 23.2% in Hillsboro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Leominster at 15.5% compared to 11.8% in Hillsboro.
- Binge drinking is more common in Leominster at 16.9% compared to 16.6% in Hillsboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Leominster at 32.8% compared to 32.5% in Hillsboro.
- Disability percentages are higher in Leominster at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Hillsboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Leominster | Hillsboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (477) | 1.3% (1,418) |
High School Diploma | 18.2% (7,932) | 10.0% (10,733) |
Less than High School | 13.5% (5,889) | 11.5% (12,373) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.1% (10,530) | 28.8% (30,912) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leominster vs Hillsboro
- In Hillsboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.1% in Leominster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leominster hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 10.0% in Hillsboro.
- More residents in Leominster have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 11.5% in Hillsboro.
- In Hillsboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.8% compared to 24.1% in Leominster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.