Demographics details for Lees summit, MO vs Newark, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lees summit, MO vs Newark, OH.
| Data | Lees summit | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 103,465 | 50,763 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 38.5 years |
| Median Income | $103,447 | $56,284 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Lees summit vs Newark
- In Lees summit, the population is higher at 103,465, compared to 50,763 in Newark.
- Residents in Lees summit have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 38.5 years in Newark.
- Lees summit has a higher median income of $103,447 compared to $56,284 in Newark.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lees summit at 45.0% compared to 35.0% in Newark.
- The poverty level is higher in Newark at 12%, compared to 5% in Lees summit.
- Newark has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.3% in Lees summit.
Demographics
Demographics Lees summit vs Newark provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lees summit | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 3 |
| White | 78 | 88 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lees summit vs Newark
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lees summit at 9% compared to 3% in Newark.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Newark at 88% compared to 78% in Lees summit.
- The Asian population is larger in Lees summit at 2% compared to 1% in Newark.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lees summit at 5% compared to 3% in Newark.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lees summit at 6% compared to 5% in Newark.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lees summit and Newark at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lees summit | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 13.1% | 23.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.7% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 33.2% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lees summit vs Newark
- In Newark, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 16.0% in Lees summit.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Newark at 26.0% versus 21.8% in Lees summit.
- Newark has a higher smoking rate at 23.2% compared to 13.1% in Lees summit.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lees summit at 21.7% compared to 16.8% in Newark.
- Newark has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 33.2% in Lees summit.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Newark at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Lees summit.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lees summit | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (298) | 0.5% (258) |
| High School Diploma | 11.1% (11,521) | 21.6% (10,967) |
| Less than High School | 3.2% (3,308) | 10.6% (5,370) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.3% (33,401) | 15.0% (7,627) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lees summit vs Newark
- In Newark, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Lees summit.
- In Newark, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 11.1% in Lees summit.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Newark at 10.6%, compared to 3.2% in Lees summit.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lees summit hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 15.0% in Newark.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.