Demographics details for Lancaster, SC vs Broad brook, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, SC vs Broad brook, CT.
Data | Lancaster | Broad brook |
---|---|---|
Population | 104,577 | 4,006 |
Median Age | 42.2 years | 36.9 years |
Median Income | $72,186 | $93,243 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Broad brook
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 104,577, compared to 4,006 in Broad brook.
- Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 42.2 years compared to 36.9 years in Broad brook.
- Broad brook has a higher median income of $93,243, compared to $72,186 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 42.0% compared to 35.0% in Broad brook.
- Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Broad brook.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.2% in Broad brook.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Broad brook provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lancaster | Broad brook |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | 18 |
White | 70 | 58 |
Asian | 2 | 10 |
Hispanic | 6 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Broad brook
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Lancaster and Broad brook at 18%.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 58% in Broad brook.
- In Broad brook, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 2% in Lancaster.
- Broad brook has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 6% in Lancaster.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lancaster at 4% compared to 2% in Broad brook.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Broad brook at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lancaster | Broad brook |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 9.7% |
Depression | 22.0% | 24.8% |
Smoking | 16.9% | 14.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 33.4% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Broad brook
- In Broad brook, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.6% in Lancaster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Broad brook at 24.8% versus 22.0% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lancaster at 16.9% compared to 14.2% in Broad brook.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 17.3% compared to 15.9% in Broad brook.
- Broad brook has higher obesity rates at 33.4% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Broad brook.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lancaster | Broad brook |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (689) | 2.8% (113) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (16,691) | 12.6% (504) |
Less than High School | 12.5% (13,112) | 5.8% (231) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (21,156) | 30.7% (1,230) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Broad brook
- In Broad brook, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.7% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 12.6% in Broad brook.
- More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 12.5% compared to 5.8% in Broad brook.
- In Broad brook, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.7% compared to 20.2% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.