Demographics details for Kaysville, UT vs Deshler, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kaysville, UT vs Deshler, OH.
| Data | Kaysville | Deshler |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,761 | 1,571 |
| Median Age | 32.1 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $121,867 | $57,273 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Kaysville vs Deshler
- In Kaysville, the population is higher at 32,761, compared to 1,571 in Deshler.
- The median age in Deshler is higher at 36.7 years, compared to 32.1 years in Kaysville.
- Kaysville has a higher median income of $121,867 compared to $57,273 in Deshler.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kaysville at 45.0% compared to 41.0% in Deshler.
- The poverty level is higher in Deshler at 10%, compared to 0% in Kaysville.
- Deshler has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.7% in Kaysville.
Demographics
Demographics Kaysville vs Deshler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kaysville | Deshler |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 88 | 84 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kaysville vs Deshler
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Kaysville and Deshler at 0%.
- Kaysville has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 84% in Deshler.
- The Asian population is larger in Kaysville at 1% compared to 0% in Deshler.
- Deshler has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 5% in Kaysville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kaysville at 6% compared to 4% in Deshler.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kaysville and Deshler at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kaysville | Deshler |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 6.7% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.4% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 42.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kaysville vs Deshler
- In Deshler, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 14.8% in Kaysville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kaysville at 23.7% compared to 23.3% in Deshler.
- Deshler has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 6.7% in Kaysville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Deshler at 18.9% compared to 11.4% in Kaysville.
- Deshler has higher obesity rates at 42.3% compared to 31.6% in Kaysville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Deshler at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Kaysville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kaysville | Deshler |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (141) | 3.1% (49) |
| High School Diploma | 6.1% (1,986) | 27.5% (432) |
| Less than High School | 2.6% (859) | 19.6% (308) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.5% (9,340) | 11.5% (180) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kaysville vs Deshler
- In Deshler, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.4% in Kaysville.
- In Deshler, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.5% compared to 6.1% in Kaysville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Deshler at 19.6%, compared to 2.6% in Kaysville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kaysville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 11.5% in Deshler.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.