Demographics details for House springs, MO vs Fairburn, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in House springs, MO vs Fairburn, GA.

Data House springs Fairburn
Population 12,300 16,956
Median Age 35.0 years 30.9 years
Median Income $60,000 $67,245
Married Families 50.0% 20.0%
Poverty Level 10% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.2

Population Comparison: House springs vs Fairburn

  • The population in Fairburn is higher at 16,956, compared to 12,300 in House springs.
  • Residents in House springs have a higher median age of 35.0 years compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
  • Fairburn has a higher median income of $67,245, compared to $60,000 in House springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in House springs at 50.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fairburn at 15%, compared to 10% in House springs.
  • Fairburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.0% in House springs.

Demographics

Demographics House springs vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic House springs Fairburn
Black 5 73
White 90 12
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 12
Two or More Races 5 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: House springs vs Fairburn

  • In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 5% in House springs.
  • House springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
  • The Asian population is larger in House springs at 3% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
  • Fairburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 2% in House springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in House springs at 5% compared to 3% in Fairburn.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both House springs and Fairburn at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric House springs Fairburn
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.9%
Depression Data is updating% 16.8%
Smoking Data is updating% 15.6%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 15.0%
Obesity Data is updating% 33.7%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: House springs vs Fairburn

  • In Fairburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in House springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fairburn at 16.8% versus 0.0% in House springs.
  • Fairburn has a higher smoking rate at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in House springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairburn at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in House springs.
  • Fairburn has higher obesity rates at 33.7% compared to 0.0% in House springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairburn at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in House springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level House springs Fairburn
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.5% (78)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.3% (2,082)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 5.7% (961)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 21.2% (3,591)

Education Levels Comparison: House springs vs Fairburn

  • In Fairburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in House springs.
  • In Fairburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.3% compared to 0.0% in House springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairburn at 5.7%, compared to 0.0% in House springs.
  • In Fairburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 0.0% in House springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.