Demographics details for Holdenville, OK vs Clifton, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Holdenville, OK vs Clifton, KS.
| Data | Holdenville | Clifton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,916 | 447 |
| Median Age | 36.1 years | 43.5 years |
| Median Income | $38,232 | $51,563 |
| Married Families | 22.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Holdenville vs Clifton
- In Holdenville, the population is higher at 5,916, compared to 447 in Clifton.
- The median age in Clifton is higher at 43.5 years, compared to 36.1 years in Holdenville.
- Clifton has a higher median income of $51,563, compared to $38,232 in Holdenville.
- In Clifton, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 22.0% in Holdenville.
- Holdenville has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 0% in Clifton.
- The unemployment rate in Holdenville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Clifton.
Demographics
Demographics Holdenville vs Clifton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Holdenville | Clifton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | Data is updating |
| White | 55 | 93 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 1 |
| American Indian | 20 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Holdenville vs Clifton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Holdenville at 7% compared to 0% in Clifton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clifton at 93% compared to 55% in Holdenville.
- In Clifton, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Holdenville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Holdenville at 9% compared to 2% in Clifton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Holdenville at 8% compared to 1% in Clifton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Holdenville at 20% compared to 0% in Clifton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Holdenville | Clifton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.6% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 20.7% |
| Smoking | 27.5% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 20.8% |
| Obesity | 43.3% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Holdenville vs Clifton
- More residents in Holdenville report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 15.7% in Clifton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Holdenville at 24.6% compared to 20.7% in Clifton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Holdenville at 27.5% compared to 18.8% in Clifton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clifton at 20.8% compared to 14.4% in Holdenville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Holdenville at 43.3% compared to 40.0% in Clifton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clifton at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Holdenville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Holdenville | Clifton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (67) | 0.4% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 23.1% (1,369) | 29.1% (130) |
| Less than High School | 24.9% (1,471) | 7.2% (32) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (415) | 14.5% (65) |
Education Levels Comparison: Holdenville vs Clifton
- A higher percentage of residents in Holdenville have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Clifton.
- In Clifton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.1% compared to 23.1% in Holdenville.
- More residents in Holdenville have less than a high school education at 24.9% compared to 7.2% in Clifton.
- In Clifton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 7.0% in Holdenville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.